P Spencer wrote in a message to Bob Kohl:
PS>         3.0???  I don't think so...  :)  At any rate, we
PS> have 2.02...which is what is likely to work on our nearly
PS> toothless 386...   yesyes...I've been given to understand
PS> we're gonna need to upgrade.  The question is...which is
PS> more important?  - the horses or the 'puter.  In my book,
PS> the horse comes first, the 'puter comes 2nd (of course.?.).
PS> We don't always have a fully consenting household here...and
PS> that's 'of course', too...  >
     TOOTHLESS?  Our BBS has run for years on a 386 DX 33...admittedly, with 
the 8 meg of RAM, it runs smoother.  But our users report very little 
slowdown when I'm multitasking in the background.  I mean, THEIR background, 
MY foreground.
     But the horses HAVE always come before the computers, in my book.
--- timEd/2 1.00
---------------