From: MarkA 

On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 11:09:48 -0800, Robert wrote:

> On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 22:55:10 -0500, MarkA  wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 14:43:30 -0800, Robert wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 23:07:08 GMT, "Smiler"
 wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Not entirely correct. ( Apart from some bloody minded
fanatics who
>>>>> are wrong)
>>>>> The Church teaches that the use of condoms as a means of
>>>>> contraception is wrong.
>>>>> The church also teaches that in matters of morality
everyone must
>>>>> first and foremost obey his or her conscience.
>>>>
>>>>But in the eyes of the RCC, condom use is still wrong.
>>>
>>>   Correct, because sex as entertainment is wrong. Sex is for
>>> conception. The only moral and effective means of avoiding a unwanted
>>> pregnancy is abstinence, which also avoids STDS. STDS and unwanted
>>> pregnancies are Gods punishment for having sex, to entertain your self.
>>> Sex is always wrong unless a husband wants his wife to have a child.
>>
>>If sex is only for conception, you would think that God would want to
>>make it easy to tell when a woman is ovulating.
>
> If there were a God, and that God was intelligent, then you would be
> correct. I believe that evolution selected for, women being sexually
> available all the time so that men would stay around and help raise the
> young. Most men today would stay in front of the T.V. and watch ball
> games, instead of having sex.

Do you think LCD TVs will cause women to start having estrus cycles?

--
MarkA
(this space accidentally filled in)

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag