Hello Rick,

On 31 Oct 16 16:33, Rick Christian wrote to Nicholas Boel:

 NB>> I believe you were already told that CM v1.5's deb package
 NB>> includes broken binaries. Your better bet is probably to compile
 NB>> the original (.71?) or have someone (I believe Paul Quinn already
 NB>> offered you binaries of the original version) give you some
 NB>> binaries to try out.

 RC> I don't think it matters what version it is...

Ok. Again you seem to have all the answers and care more to argue about it than
actually try what you've been told multiple times to try, even though every
*WORKING* version running these days (ie: Björn and Paul off the top of my
head) are running 0.71, not any of the other versions you are attempting and
failing with.

 RC> 0.71 has 5-6 files in the directory some too small to be source, no
 RC> clear directions on what to use, so moved on to 0.75 instead.

Anything above 0.71 was NOT by the original author. Whoever decided to break
the package did it on their own. We are all telling you that you should give
0.71 a try, yet you've now tried two versions besides that one with no luck.

FWIW, I've tried three times to help you out (ie: binkd, husky project, and now
crashmail), and you've refused the help, deciding to argue your point instead,
to get multiple softwares working. Good luck in your adventure. It will get
harder and harder the more you refuse the assistance from others.

Regards,
Nick

... "Не знаю. Я здесь только работаю."
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20160827