From: "Robert Comer" 

> nano is no ultraedit :)

That's for sure!

>but it's good enough for editing config files
> and such.

That's the only thing I use it for too.

>but as
> someone mentioned, nano is in almost as many places as vi.

I didn't know that, Ubuntu is the first one I've tried that I had to find it.

--
Bob Comer





"/m"  wrote in message
news:5s5fb21ckqivo1hugg3g27fjlrp0l2urhe{at}4ax.com...
> On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 08:45:28 -0400, "Robert Comer"
>  wrote:
>
>>Ubuntu has nano too, but I'm not wild about it.  It does run in a cmd line
>>though...
>
> nano is no ultraedit :)  but it's good enough for editing config files
> and such.  I wouldn't want to use nano for a lot of editing; but as
> someone mentioned, nano is in almost as many places as vi.
>
> /m

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5