| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | ATM Schmidt vs Slevogt |
From: George Anderson To: atm Reply-To: George Anderson I received the glass for the ~6" schmidt camera that I am planning on building. For those that are curious or interested Surplus Shed has 6" f/2 uncoated mirrors which they say are 1/4 wave for $45 (one or two minor blems). For the corrector I am planning on using a 3/8" thick clear photographic filter from the same source (cost $9) and as backup I have an optical glass parallel plate which is 1/4" ($5 same source) thick that I will trepan. I still have to test the two for stress and striae as well as measure the sg to try to determine if they are BK7 or similar. But, while waiting for the glass to arrive I re-read R&V as well as stumbled across a few websites which touted the advantages of a concentric cassegrain or Slevogt camera (flat field outside of the tube). Before I start messing about with Oslo, would a 6" f/2 Slevogt for 35mm be realistic or will the secondary be excessively large thus substantialy reducing the true speed of the camera? I am just sounding out to see if the concept is worth persuing and realize that it means coring the mirror after it is ground and polished. George Anderson Montreal Canada Clear skies and good health --- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4* Origin: Email Gate (1:379/100) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/100 1 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.