TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: muffin
to: Roy J. Tellason
from: Linda Hargraves
date: 1998-10-17 19:26:30
subject: Max2.02

Hi Roy,

 RJT> Linda Hargraves wrote in a message to All:
 LH> Hi,
 LH>   Dos anyone know about Max2.02? 

 RJT> Sure,  I ran it here for a while.
 LH> I seem to be having a few problems with some of my games 
 LH> locking up on the users side.  I came in here and saw that it 
 LH> was locked up at a menu (half drawn) and on the status line at 
 LH> the far right corner, a letter F was flashing.

 RJT> That's "Flow control",  which means that somewhere 
 RJT> along the line either the computer or the modem got 
 RJT> confused about whether somebody was ready for more 
 RJT> data.  You don't have software flow control enabled in 
 RJT> your modem,  do you?  I use just hardware flow control 
 RJT> here,  and things work well.  Especially if you've got 
 RJT> your port locked to a higher speed than what goes out 
 RJT> the wire on the phone line...

   I have my modem set for hardware flow control and BNU is locked at 57.6.
Would that be a cause if the caller had software instead of hardware flow
control turned on?

 LH>   Also want to ask if there is a y2k patch for Max 2.02 and 
 LH> squish 1.11?  Will that cover the OLR as well?  Am I going to 
 LH> have to upgrade to Max3.01 to solve y2k problems?

 RJT> I doubt that there's going to be any further updates 
 RJT> to 2.02,  and think that there is supposed to be a fix 
 RJT> out for Squish.

 RJT> Why not upgrade?  I didn't find it that bad,  though 
 RJT> it took a little bit of fiddling.  One of the nice 
 RJT> things about newer hard drives with all of the space 
 RJT> they have available is that it's quite feasible to 
 RJT> make a copy of your whole working setup,  so that if 
 RJT> you run into a problem you can just restore things 
 RJT> back to the way they were,  while you figure out how to deal with it.

   The main reason I haven't, is because I only have a 125 meg hard drive
and can't afford any more.
 LH>   Another question I want to ask, is there a way to post a 
 LH> general message to all users like {at}all?  I tried that and it 
 LH> does not work.
 RJT> What didn't work?  What did it do?
  I tried to use {at}all in a local message base it is said no user by that
name.  I usually address a message to one user, then change to all and it
takes it.

  Linda
    cat.lady{at}cats.gratisnet.com

--- Maximus 2.02
* Origin: Cat House BBS * Tulsa BBS List HQ * (918) 584-3441 (1:170/160)
SEEN-BY: 396/1 632/0 371 633/260 267 270 284 371 634/397 635/506 725 728
SEEN-BY: 639/252 670/218
@PATH: 170/160 100 400 396/1 633/260 635/506 728 633/267

SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.