| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | RE: Addy. |
-=> Quoting Ed Koon to Nancy Backus on 03-13-04 22:47 <=- NB> Do you know why it doesn't support QWK? (Seems strange to me... also, I NB> thought that was what some other boards are using, with QWK, but I could NB> be mistaken.) EK> Thinking back to the good old days and doing some reminiscing, I EK> remember the wildcat version 5 release. Think it was 1997 or 1998, EK> Anyway Wildcat BBS Software has always used a door for netmail. With EK> WC4 we had a choice of several front end mailers, Most sysops used EK> Wildmail by Joe (cant remember last name) We all cursed it but.. And EK> there was Platinum Xpress by Hector Santos, not the most popular but EK> it worked well. Was this the same for the echomail, or just the netmail itself? EK> From what i understand when WC5 was released most third party EK> programmers were not ready with the exception of Hector Santos. So if EK> you were running WC5 you were stuck with PXW for the mail tosser. EK> Meanwhile Mustang Software (MSI) the once popular Wildcat bbs software EK> company started going under and the program had lots of features that EK> were never ported over from the WC4 days, One being a EK> netmail door. Hector Santos whipped one up that would work with his EK> OPX Packet style Offline Reader Silver Xpress. Again, this sounds like it impacted all of the Fido mail, for the echoes as well as the netmail whether routed or direct? EK> About this time sysops were finding out that WC5 like night and day EK> from WC4 would need a ton of ram and a fast cpu to run on, And Windows EK> 95 was the only os it would operate on was as buggy as WC5! EK> A lot has changed since those days, Hector Santos bought the rights to EK> WC5 from EK> Mustang and has done a fine job of improving it. Except enhancements EK> have been directed towards internet users, Now called Winserver the EK> package is intended for isp's and corporations needing a web solution EK> that supports http, email, ftp, and user accts. Hector last updated the EK> front end and mail tosser in 06/2000 and no further ftsc development is EK> being done. So this is all about how the mail is tossed to be sent out? EK> There are other updates to Winserver available but nothing that will EK> fix the netmail problem. And we run a 3rd party program by Earl Borah EK> called web messaging pro which enhanced the Web interface of the bbs EK> and added the QWK by web browser option, It is no longer being EK> developed either. So here we are :) OK. I'm still not sure how all this answered my original question about QWK being supported... But perhaps that's partly my fault, as I didn't explicitly ask in what way QWK wasn't supported. If I understand this correctly, it would appear that the only way qwk would work on the bbs would be if one were coming in via the web as opposed to via telnet. Which is obviously not the case, as I and Jean come in via telnet, and the qwk works just fine for regular (ie local or echo) messages. So I'm still a bit confused... :) PX and SX are/were both maildoor/reader systems, with their own propietary packet setups, just like Bluewave is/was, right? I know that George Hatchew built in a certain amount of qwk support into BW; are you saying that Hector didn't do any of that for SX/PX? Netmail compatibility for qwk packets wasn't fully built into BW, though. So I learned to put the net/node address on the first line of the message for the tosser to pick up on. Each bbs software had a different form that that needed to go into, of course... :) If one was making native BW messages to go into a BW door, the addresses all went into the header as one would have expected. EK> Doc's Place is running on my home network connected by cable modem. It EK> has its own dedicated Pentium 1.8 GHZ computer with a Gig of ram. EK> Running under Windows 2k Professional. It stays up for weeks at a time EK> without a re-boot. It has came a long way since the early days.. EK> Who ever thought the BBS Scene would still be around these days? Some of us couldn't imagine the world without it, still... :) I've been actively bbs'ing (as a user, not a sysop) since the early 1990's. My then teenage son talked me into trying it out, using my interest in genealogy as the hook. One of my early sysops pressed Zmodem and Bluewave on me, and I was off and running... Been a user on many different kinds of bbs software over the years... Maximus, Telegard, Renegade, PCBoard, Wildcat, Synchronet, TBBS, EleBBS... and more that I don't even remember their names. :) ttyl neb ... Wanna be considered special? Visit a BBS. Inet is for the rest. ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.20 --- ViaMAIL!/WC v1.60d* Origin: Chowdanet (401-331-0615) telnet://chowdanet.com (1:323/120) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 323/120 123/500 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.