> > me... it appears they (the prairie dogs, not the postal workers,
> > though
> > that's always an option) gnawed on it and destroyed most the
> > address.
>
> It's probably Prairie Dog envy.

LOL
Not. Going. There.
Not.

> > their enhanced breeding program, but what they fail to understand is
> > that  I'm *rooting* for the prairie dogs...
>
> =g=
> And it was sent before all your Prairie Dog rah-rahing....

which I noticed :)

> > and they managed to find me on Ida Dr. in apt 532 in Colorado... in
> > only 12
> > days from when the card was ostensibly mailed (I believe on the 5th
> > of the stamp is trustworthy)
>
> Go USPS cryptographers! (of course, did some of the bar coding survive?)

Well, shoot... didn't even think of that.
Yes -- the whole strip was on the front.
Well darn...

> > Well done.
>
> well, I was cruising by the rack in the grocery store.....
> >
> > (and very cute card :)
>
> With, clearly, a tale to tell. [Should I send you an unconsumed version?]

No need -- the front was fine :)
I figure it got caught on a roller or something... it was sheered up on the
back side, but the front was fine

> And sounds far more interesting than why our mail sorter has CONSISTENTLY
> given me my NEIGHBOR'S Martha Stewart Living ON THE SAME DAY I get my
> own. I realize I read in stereo, but, really! [Even wrote a note on
> precisely that point, but, apparently, to no avail. Ah well!]

that's just weird...
though I had similar things going on with one postal worker doing the mail
here.
She was always putting the mail for 523 into my box (532)
turned out it's sorted at the post office, and the carrier just drops it in
the box -- so she had no idea she was giving me the wrong stuff.
(don't they look? No time I guess...)
but still... I think I'd question "why 2 Martha Stewart Living to the same
place?"



--- Rachel's Little NET2FIDO Gate v 0.9.9.8 Alpha