From: AMBAN 

In article , CE says...
>
>On Mar 27, 10:01 pm, Lady Carrigaholt  wrote:
>> CE wrote:
>> > 
>>
>> > > you ignored all the facts presented to you and
>>> > continued to postulate some fairy tale that men were the
great defenders
and
>> > > protectors of women.
>>
>> > Even in today's society, a man's role is to defend and provide for
>> > women and children.
>>
>> I do quite nicely without one, as does every other Lesbian mother....
>
>Unless you're living in a society with an army of women soldiers,
>police forces comprised of women, and firefighting crews comprised of
>women - or even of women and men in equal numbers - then you're
>depending on men for your safety and the stability of the society in
>which you live.
>
>By the way, any lesbian who has had children has had to have a man in
>her life at some point, even if only to provide the sperm for her to
>conceive. So, in a very real sense, you could not have become a
>mother, lesbian or otherwise, without a man.
>
>Given that, why are you deluding yourself into believing you don't
>need men?
>
>>
>> > There are still many more men than women in the
>> > armies and police forces and on firefighting crews. Just count the
>> > bodies of soldiers coming back from the war. Men are also still
>> > regarded as providers with many, many women hoping to marry a man
>> > who's financially secure
>>
>>I had people wanting to marry me because I was financially secure....men, get
>>over
>> yourselves...(Arcers excluded)
>
>LOL
>
>It's not men - or, at least, not primarily men - who want men to have
>this role of provider. If you look around you'll realize that many
>women want men to be financially secure to provide for their wives.
>
>You may be an exception to the rule or you may simply, as a lesbian
>who is financially secure, simply be attracting women who want you to
>provide for them. You don't say in your post whether or not these
>people who wanted to marry you because of your wealth were men or
>women. If they were women, then all it shows is reinforce what I'm
>saying that women tend to seek out people who can provide for them.
>Since the vast majority of people are heterosexual, that usually means
>women seek out financially-secure men. For lesbians, I guess they'd be
>looking for a financially-secure woman.

Most families have two wage earners.  Most women come home from work and do
the housework too.  Most single parent families are headed by women.  
There are
more women than men in Universities now even though women still only make
70 cents to the dollar that men do.
Come out of the clouds or go back to your cave.  You are dreaming.  I could just
as well say men seek out women to have their mother still pay the bills,
clean up and bear children.  It would be closer to the truth.  (Arcers
excluded)

I gave you the stats for this in another post long ago.  You are deluding yourself.

AMBAN

 >

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag