CH> Anyway, from your perspective I see your point. From mine, however,
CH> when their posts are defamatory I hardly see any reason or 
CH> justification or strategy in sitting by and letting them get away with 
CH> it.  To the extent that this imposes on the rights of other people on
CH> the conference, I certainly apologize.  However, it is somewhat out of
CH> my control; and it is they who are making the objectionable posts.Excuse 
me, but you basically said you're sorry but it's not your fault.  In case you 
haven't notice, these contradict each other.  However, I am also tired of the 
fighting.  However, as I have stated to someone else, I am not going to wave 
a white flag just to get shot at.  So, I'm willing to make a deal with you.  
You stop attacking me in your posts to me and at least TRY to respect mine 
and other's viewpoints at least on this echo.  In turn, I will stop my 
attacks, publically appologize for my part in it, and not ask for your 
credintials again.  Deal?
You really have nothing to lose in the agreement I just drew up unles you 
just like fighting, which in that case, I don't run from a fight and 
therefore nothing can be done.  I'm willing to comprimise, so send in what 
you want.  I'll try to work it out if you're willing to comprimise in return. 
 I am awaiting your answer, assuming I haven't been twitted yet.  Make NO 
mistake, this is no flag of truce.  This is a cease fire until we get the 
agreement drawn up.  If attacked, I WILL attack back.
Peace.
--- CNet/3
---------------