Hello Maurice!
03 Sep 2017 07:35, Maurice Kinal wrote to Benny Pedersen:
MK> Hey Benny!
BP>> drop multilib, it saves ram, and raise speeds
MK> I haven't used multilib since the first custom build I did way back
MK> when, around 15 years ago. See below for the latest glibc deployed
MK> here;
after i dropped f-prot, bitdefender, it was not needed for me to use 32bit
glibc anymore, after that all was 64bit elf, and i got more memory to do other
more usefull things with it
MK> ----- ':read !/lib/libc.so.6' starts
MK> GNU C Library (GNU libc) stable release version 2.26, by Roland
MK> McGrath et al.
MK> Copyright (C) 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
MK> This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
MK> There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
MK> PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
MK> Compiled by GNU CC version 7.2.0.
MK> Available extensions:
MK> crypt add-on version 2.1 by Michael Glad and others
MK> GNU Libidn by Simon Josefsson
MK> Native POSIX Threads Library by Ulrich Drepper et al
MK> BIND-8.2.3-T5B
MK> libc ABIs: UNIQUE IFUNC
MK> For bug reporting instructions, please see:
MK> .
MK> ----- ':read !/lib/libc.so.6' ends
how do you make that output ?, imho its not ldd :=)
MK> Furthermore there is no lib64 even as symlinks anywhere on the latest
MK> x86_64-silvermont-linux-gnu, or my other box which is a comparable
MK> x86_64-bonnell-linux-gnu.
this is generic how its done, just in case you have 64bit, and builded some
errors, you can do a bootstrap on 32bit to fix it, well its hard, but not for a
talented fool :=)
systemresquecd would just be better choice and chroot it there
MK> The only reason I mentioned multilib was because someone here stated
MK> that he required 32 bit libs to run some games on what looks to me to
MK> be a 64 bit system. Also it was a reply to one of my aarch64 running
MK> on a raspberry pi 3 so I suspect he thought that the aarch64 ought to
MK> be multilib which it isn't, or at least the one I first built wasn't.
i readed it as it was some game that is not localy compiled ?, or was localy
compiled but failed to work ?, hmm if it was gentoo it was just a matter of
revdep-rebuild :=)
BP>> this is still not gentoo :=)
MK> Correct. I don't have any of their tools and instead built my own and
MK> so far continue to use those. Simple, lean and mean for whatever task
MK> they are allocated to take care of.
i like to get lowpowered atom cpu bassed servers in comming years, here, the
old p4 is soon time to be retired as my best friend, done from my time learning
gentoo, and why use gentoo, if you google xpoint fidonet you can find redhat 8,
lol, maybe i could give Mr Maddog a fidonet number :=) (Mark Hall....)
he is well known in redhat and now small computers, and i have meet him in my
local town here in danmark, he sleeped around a mile from me, oh this memories
BP>> but atom is atleast not supporting intel ME (nsa / fbi / silly
BP>> govments interfaces>
MK> I honestly don't care. None of them are paying the bills here so
MK> their input ... or lack of it ... is of no importance, especially
MK> considering that they are US government and not Canadian.
its not that simple for all outside of canadien borders, nsa and danish
counterpart of it pet, do some silly privacy exchanges, and there is not even a
bill to pay
BP>> if i know right systemd parts on linux help it
MK> Not that I ever noticed. I am still using sysvinit. Also still using
MK> lilo instead of (U)EFI boots ... just like Mom used to do. :-)
yep, i just dont know how and why linux have systemd at all
MK> I see no reason to change ... yet. Do you?
still using gentoo here with systemd disabled
MK> Life is good,
MK> Maurice
yep
MK> ... Don't cry for me I have vi.
MK> -+- GNU bash, version 4.4.12(1)-release (x86_64-silvermont-linux-gnu)
MK> + Origin: Little Mikey's Brain - Ladysmith BC, Canada (1:153/7001)
Regards Benny
... there can only be one way of life, and it works :)
--- Msged/LNX 6.2.0 (Linux/4.12.10-gentoo (i686))
* Origin: openvpn on its way here (2:230/0)
|