| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: daddy long legs |
Hey Nancy! Apr 09 23:40 06, Nancy Backus wrote to Maurice Kinal: NB> Aye, there's the rub. (to quote someone famous) Often people NB> *aren't* NB> honest, either with themselves or with each other.... Amen. I suppose the reason might be that whatever it is they want/need they'd rather not admit to seeing it might ruffle feathers. With male/female relationships honesty might not be the best policy but then again one has to ask themselves if it requires being a phoney is a relationship worth the effort, especially what it will take to get out of it once it has been determined that it isn't worth it. Throw children into the mess, especially when they weren't wanted, and it can get really ugly, really fast and everyone comes out a loser, especially the children. NB> terribly NB> easy to fool oneself that one is indeed seeing the attributes NB> desired, NB> even when they aren't really there, in a person with whom one becomes NB> infatuated. That can happen for sure. NB> And there are far too many people who put on a persona NB> or a NB> facade to look as though they are someone they are not, in reality. Right. See my first paragraph. I think that was my point or a healthy part of it. NB> In theory, I suppose... :) Or, perhaps better stated, the list is NB> the NB> working out of the basic wants in terms of the practical NB> applications. Put it this way, if either party doesn't know the practical applications and how to deal with them before getting married then I think there is a good chance that both are off to a very bad start. Having said that, sometimes it gets worked out fine along the way but I think that is an exception rather then a rule. MK>> Then that husband wasn't being honest wrt the basic wants of a MK>> relationship. NB> Oh, it's often stated right up front, what the expectations would be, Sometimes I suppose. I don't know. It has been quite some time for me as far as male/female relationships are concerned. After my only marriage, I haven't really pursued a live together relationship with a woman as I doubt women would appreciate the path I ended up travelling on since. Me? I am not convinced I appreciated it but here I am. NB> by NB> both men and women... Some of it is cultural, particularly those NB> from NB> one's childhood upbringing, I imagine so although I don't find myself there even when I was there. Something went 'wrong' somewhere along the line since if my upbringing was such an influence then neither my marriage or newfound singulatrity is reflected that I can see. NB> No, but the relationship makes a difference as to how the task is NB> tackled, and by whom, and in which circumstances... :) I suppose. Speaking for myself the children usually decided that and often that ended up being me. I think I was a fairly good 'mother' to them. :-) NB> example of the dishes.... If there's only one person generating the NB> dishes, of course that person is responsible for doing them up. Once NB> there are 2 or more people, whose responsibility it is becomes an NB> issue... Oh yeah! Add children to the mix and it becomes even more of an issue. That is usually when the subject of allowance comes up. NB> each could be responsible for the dishes self-generated, or NB> one person could be designated to always clean them up, or it could NB> be NB> on a rota basis, or.... various permutations... :) And when the NB> expectations, stated or not, aren't met, then the relationship is NB> usually what suffers. And this isn't solely in marital or NB> male-female NB> relationships, of course... Right. I'd agree with that. NB> I threw those in as being expectations, rather than necessarily valid NB> ones. Generally that sort of expectations are more artificial, and NB> yes, NB> often a part of an extra-marital relationship, or seen as NB> justification NB> for cheating, sad to say. Hm. NB> do it oneself, whatever the job may be. So one looks for a wife or a NB> husband to take the job over for them... but, for the expectations of Not me. I don't like doing dishes but I'd rather just do them then use that as an excuse for wanting a wife. I can think of MUCH better reasons for having a wife around then having someone to do my dishes. ;-) Having said that, not always for that particular reason either but certainly that reason moreso then a dishwasher. NB> Well, yes... Not that our marriage is perfect, by any means, NB> but NB> we have* worked out SOME of it... Sounds perfect to me but then I suppose we'd need to define perfection, no? NB> niece comes over to clean for us, for a modest fee. She does much NB> better than I could or would, so I'm glad to let her do it. Sounds like an ideal setup all around. NB> Goes both ways, of course... One has to put up with us, too... :) Right. I haven't found that person yet ... not that I am looking all that hard. I am not sure why I am not looking but I am not for whatever reason. Life is good, Maurice --- Msged/LNX 6.2.0* Origin: The Pointy Stick Society XVII - When I was ... (1:261/38.9) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 261/38 123/500 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.