From: Jeff North 

On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 01:18:18 GMT, in alt.politics.homosexuality
"Andrealphus" 
 wrote:

>| In News 0pudncs3Uo4675TbnZ2dnUVZ_rWnnZ2d{at}ptd.net,, stumper at
>| stumper{at}newvessel.com, typed this:
>|
>| > Patriot Games wrote:
>| >> "Andrealphus" 
wrote in message
>| >> news:B8XNh.16715$tD2.12658{at}newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>| >>> In News _bRNh.12955$un.1996{at}trnddc03,, Patriot Games at
>| >>> Crazy_Bastard{at}Yahoo.com, typed this:
>| >>>> "Andrealphus"
 wrote in message
>| >>>> news:9NENh.15103$PL.930{at}newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>| >>>>> In News XXyNh.3226$xE.1072{at}trnddc08,, Patriot Games at
>| >>>>> Crazy_Bastard{at}Yahoo.com, typed this:
>| >>>>>> "Dionisio"
 wrote in message
>| >>>>>> news:4605a399$0$27027$4c368faf{at}roadrunner.com...
>| >>>>>>> Patriot Games wrote:
>| >>>>>>>> Because I KNEW Lott DIDN'T commit incest....
>| >>>>>>>> I always prefer to have a liar out
themselves by they
>| >>>>>>>> themselves posting that which traps them....
>| >>>>>>> Now this should be fascinating. Do tell
how one has sex with
>| >>>>>>> one's daughters without > committing incest.
>| >>>>>>> (Don't forget to out yourself, liar.)
>| >>>>>> He was raped, he was unconscious.
>| >>>>> He was unconscious, yet conscious enough to
maintain an erection,
>| >>>>> but not conscious enough to recognize is own daughter.
>| >>>>> I think the entire story was written by the
villiage idiot.
>| >>>> Thanks for sharing...
>| >>> Can you at least attempt to address the logical flaws in
the story?
>| >>
>| >> There are no "logical" flaws in the story.
>| >>
>| >> The story says he was unconscious.  So he was unconscious.  Nothing
>| >> illogical there.
>| >>
>| >> He apparently had a boner.  That's not physically impossible. Nothing
>| >> illogical there.
>| >>
>| >> There are no "logical" flaws in the story.
>| >>
>| >> By the way, the "but not conscious enough to recognize is own
>| >> daughter" is something YOU made up, its NOT in the
actual story....
>| >> Unconscious is unconscious.
>| >>
>| >
>| > I agree with you.
>| >
>| > But it's just a story.
>| > Why does it matter
>| > whether it has a logical flaws or not?
>| >
>|
>| Normally it wouldn't, however in the case of the bible where these nut jobs
>| are trying to promote their "superior" morality based on
these stories, it
>| is fair game to question the logic.

The 'logic' to S&G goes something like: S&G were destroyed because
it was full of homosexuals bad, bad, bad. Lott was the only righteous one
in the whole town, good, good, good. Lott and his family escaped from the
city before it was destroyed, good, good, good
Lotts wife was turned to a pillar of salt because so didn't obey her
husband, stupid bitch, stupid bitch, stupid bitch Lotts daughters got daddy
drunk (on 2 successive nights) and had sex with him. Well it was
penis/vaginal sex so it was good, good, good.
---------------------------------------------------------------
jnorthau{at}yourpantsyahoo.com.au  : Remove your pants to reply
---------------------------------------------------------------

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag