Wes Newell wrote in a message to Roy J. Tellason:
RJT> It appears, from what I'm reading in this command
RJT> reference, that if I want to run a dos program from
RJT> an OS/2 command line, all I need is something like
RJT> command /c"doscommand"
RJT> and that'll do it, exiting back to the OS/2 command
RJT> processor when it's done. At least that's what it
RJT> looks like it means. Is this right? If so, it'll
RJT> make things a bit easier for me to get going here
RJT> under a completely OS/2 system before I find
RJT> equivalents to all of the stuff I'm using now...
WN> All you need to do is run the dos program. OS/2 will open a dos
WN> box, run the program, and then return to the os/2 session all
WN> automatically. All this assumes that you loaded DOS support in
WN> the first place.
Sure did, along with winos2 support and all sorts of other junk...
I figured I might as well play with it *all* before I started messing with
the bbs machine that I *need* to have up and running properly.
WN> Assuming you still have your dos files and you have a path for
WN> them, type "edit" in an os/2 window and you'll get the idea.
I don't have any dos files on that drive that I didn't explicitly put there,
started out with a bare drive, no nothing on it.
It's been something else, trying to get used to a different way of doing
things. I've not yet begun to scratch the surface when it comes to the
command-line side of things, and the GUI side of it is very much different
than anything I've used before (not that I was a big fan of windoze or
anything like that).
I *am* "getting it", though. To the point where I have to wonder about the
authors of some of the packages I'm trying out. None of them is satisfactory
so far, or they're missing bits here and there. I couldn't understand why
some of the folks in here had a bit of a problem with so many of the
utilities they were trying out, and I have a better appreciation of it now.
Anyhow, you're saying that if I drop a dos program on that disk and just try
to run it from an OS/2 command prompt, that what's needed just happens
automatically? That'd be seriously weird, if so.
My concern right now is that I've got a whole *bunch* of stuff I run on a
regular basis, and I've only begun to hunt up OS/2 versions of some of it,
and in some cases I'm not even sure that OS/2 versions of some of that
software is available, hence my thoughts about invoking dos versions of
stuff.
email: roy.j.tellason%tanstaaf@frackit.com
---
---------------
* Origin: TANSTAAFL BBS 717-432-0764 (1:270/615)
|