On 12 Oct 96, John Piper wrote to Paul Wankadia --



 PW> ???  You mean the 33.6Kbps thing was in V.34 all along???

 JP> No, but it is now.



Didn't you write me something in NetMail about this? :)



 PW> Then why did USR call it V.34+ et al...???

 JP> Marketing. :-) When USR developed and released "V.34+",
there was no

 JP> extension to V.34 ratified by the ITU-T. The + indicated an add-on to



Did the ITU-T use USR's code?  Did the other companies use USR's code?



 JP> V.34 which catered for 31200 and 33600 connects. AFAIK, the V.34 spec

 JP> has been adjusted to now include 31200 an 33600.



Uh huh.



Chow.



Junyer Hakker.



--- PPoint 2.00