ML>> another problem is that the questions and the available
 ML>> answers are loaded in one direction rather than being
 ML>> uniform... i know that several of the questions didn't
 ML>> offer other answers that were more to my general POV...

 BK>  Actually, that is the big problem with comparing the
 BK> candidates to your ideal candidate. However, given a
 BK> choice of a very few candidates, it might be more
 BK> accurate with the limited choices.

the funny part was that only once or twice did i get a 100% for my ideal
candidate on that site... every other time is was 98% or 99%...

 ML>> i actually went thru the poll several times choosing
 ML>> different options and rankings and each time, david cobb
 ML>> was pretty much at the top of the list... kinda seems that
 ML>> the poll is leaning towards the green party and david
 ML>> cobb...

 BK>  Or maybe you just can't escape your true nature.

i didn't see a smiley so i can't tell if you were joking or not... either
way, when one choose the opposite of what one would normally and the same
candidate floats to the top, there's something to be said about that...

i'd love to hear from someone who has had a democrat or republican in the top slot...

)\/(ark