From: "Andrealphus" 

In News fh9k035kc26kg18dq008inp00nfrfeu6lp{at}4ax.com,, Jeff North at
jnorthau{at}yahoo.com.au, typed this:

> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 01:18:18 GMT, in alt.politics.homosexuality
> "Andrealphus" 
>  wrote:
>
>>> In News 0pudncs3Uo4675TbnZ2dnUVZ_rWnnZ2d{at}ptd.net,, stumper at
>>> stumper{at}newvessel.com, typed this:
>>>
>>>> Patriot Games wrote:
>>>>> "Andrealphus"
 wrote in message
>>>>> news:B8XNh.16715$tD2.12658{at}newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>>>>> In News _bRNh.12955$un.1996{at}trnddc03,, Patriot Games at
>>>>>> Crazy_Bastard{at}Yahoo.com, typed this:
>>>>>>> "Andrealphus"
 wrote in message
>>>>>>>
news:9NENh.15103$PL.930{at}newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>>>>>>> In News XXyNh.3226$xE.1072{at}trnddc08,,
Patriot Games at
>>>>>>>> Crazy_Bastard{at}Yahoo.com, typed this:
>>>>>>>>> "Dionisio"
 wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:4605a399$0$27027$4c368faf{at}roadrunner.com...
>>>>>>>>>> Patriot Games wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Because I KNEW Lott DIDN'T
commit incest....
>>>>>>>>>>> I always prefer to have a liar
out themselves by they
>>>>>>>>>>> themselves posting that which
traps them....
>>>>>>>>>> Now this should be fascinating. Do
tell how one has sex with
>>>>>>>>>> one's daughters without >
committing incest.
>>>>>>>>>> (Don't forget to out yourself, liar.)
>>>>>>>>> He was raped, he was unconscious.
>>>>>>>> He was unconscious, yet conscious enough
to maintain an
>>>>>>>> erection, but not conscious enough to
recognize is own
>>>>>>>> daughter.
>>>>>>>> I think the entire story was written by
the villiage idiot.
>>>>>>> Thanks for sharing...
>>>>>> Can you at least attempt to address the logical flaws in the
>>>>>> story?
>>>>>
>>>>> There are no "logical" flaws in the story.
>>>>>
>>>>> The story says he was unconscious.  So he was unconscious.
>>>>> Nothing illogical there.
>>>>>
>>>>> He apparently had a boner.  That's not physically impossible.
>>>>> Nothing illogical there.
>>>>>
>>>>> There are no "logical" flaws in the story.
>>>>>
>>>>> By the way, the "but not conscious enough to
recognize is own
>>>>> daughter" is something YOU made up, its NOT in the actual
>>>>> story.... Unconscious is unconscious.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I agree with you.
>>>>
>>>> But it's just a story.
>>>> Why does it matter
>>>> whether it has a logical flaws or not?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Normally it wouldn't, however in the case of the bible where these
>>> nut jobs are trying to promote their "superior"
morality based on
>>> these stories, it is fair game to question the logic.
>
> The 'logic' to S&G goes something like:
> S&G were destroyed because it was full of homosexuals bad, bad, bad.
> Lott was the only righteous one in the whole town, good, good, good.
> Lott and his family escaped from the city before it was destroyed,
> good, good, good
> Lotts wife was turned to a pillar of salt because so didn't obey her
> husband, stupid bitch, stupid bitch, stupid bitch
> Lotts daughters got daddy drunk (on 2 successive nights) and had sex
> with him. Well it was penis/vaginal sex so it was good, good, good.

LOL!  Good summary.

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag