From: "Andrealphus" 

In News 8LKdnapT4JGqfZTbnZ2dnUVZ_g-dnZ2d{at}ptd.net,, stumper at
stumper{at}newvessel.com, typed this:

> Andrealphus wrote:
>> In News 0pudncs3Uo4675TbnZ2dnUVZ_rWnnZ2d{at}ptd.net,, stumper at
>> stumper{at}newvessel.com, typed this:
>>
>>> Patriot Games wrote:
>>>> "Andrealphus" 
wrote in message
>>>> news:B8XNh.16715$tD2.12658{at}newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>>>> In News _bRNh.12955$un.1996{at}trnddc03,, Patriot Games at
>>>>> Crazy_Bastard{at}Yahoo.com, typed this:
>>>>>> "Andrealphus"
 wrote in message
>>>>>> news:9NENh.15103$PL.930{at}newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>>>>>> In News XXyNh.3226$xE.1072{at}trnddc08,, Patriot Games at
>>>>>>> Crazy_Bastard{at}Yahoo.com, typed this:
>>>>>>>> "Dionisio"
 wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:4605a399$0$27027$4c368faf{at}roadrunner.com...
>>>>>>>>> Patriot Games wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Because I KNEW Lott DIDN'T commit incest....
>>>>>>>>>> I always prefer to have a liar out
themselves by they
>>>>>>>>>> themselves posting that which traps them....
>>>>>>>>> Now this should be fascinating. Do
tell how one has sex with
>>>>>>>>> one's daughters without > committing incest.
>>>>>>>>> (Don't forget to out yourself, liar.)
>>>>>>>> He was raped, he was unconscious.
>>>>>>> He was unconscious, yet conscious enough to maintain an
>>>>>>> erection, but not conscious enough to
recognize is own daughter.
>>>>>>> I think the entire story was written by the
villiage idiot.
>>>>>> Thanks for sharing...
>>>>> Can you at least attempt to address the logical flaws in the
>>>>> story?
>>>> There are no "logical" flaws in the story.
>>>>
>>>> The story says he was unconscious.  So he was unconscious.  Nothing
>>>> illogical there.
>>>>
>>>> He apparently had a boner.  That's not physically impossible.
>>>> Nothing illogical there.
>>>>
>>>> There are no "logical" flaws in the story.
>>>>
>>>> By the way, the "but not conscious enough to recognize is own
>>>> daughter" is something YOU made up, its NOT in the
actual story....
>>>> Unconscious is unconscious.
>>>>
>>> I agree with you.
>>>
>>> But it's just a story.
>>> Why does it matter
>>> whether it has logical flaws or not?
>>>
>>
>> Normally it wouldn't, however in the case of the bible where these
>> nut jobs are trying to promote their "superior" morality based on
>> these stories, it is fair game to question the logic.
>>
>>
>
> Do you mind using a better example
> like where was Jesus at age two?

Apparently you've never read, "The Infancy Gospel".

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag