From: "_ Prof. Jonez _" 

Christopher A.Lee wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:53:29 -0500, ThePhisherKIng 
> wrote:
>
>> Kent Wills  wrote in
>> news:pnhj03ljlrlhg48b37jmqghvvi7pm6v9m5{at}4ax.com:
>>
>>> As I understand it, on Tue, 27 Mar 2007 07:25:53 -0500,
>>> ThePhisherKIng  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Kent Wills  wrote in
>>>> news:611i035ftnr8dho02t0sms38ibuh5039gl{at}4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>> As I understand it, on Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:39:37
-0600, "_ Prof.
>>>>> Jonez _"  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> POPE PROCLAIMS HELL 'EXISTS AND IS ETERNAL'
>>>>>
>>>>>      I've asked you a few times to prove atheism is correct.  As
>>>>> of my writing this, you've not done so.
>>>>>      Here's another chance for you to prove atheism is correct.
>>>>>
>>>>>      Crickets on stand-by.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Not having seen your previous posts on the subject, might I ask,
>>>> what exactly are you asking?  Proof that the non-believe in a
>>>> diety is correct? Or the non-accepting of Christianity is correct?
>>>> Or the non-acceptance of all religion? In other words, would you
>>>> rephrase the question?
>>>>
>>>
>>>      Jonez has, on many occasions and under many nyms, claimed any
>>> number of religious beliefs are wrong.  I've asked him to prove
>>> Atheism is correct.
>>
>> A-theism says that the claims of religionists, that a god exists, are
>> wrong. To date, no religionist has been able to prove their "god-
>> existance" claim to be true. Ergo, A-theism is correct. You make the
>> claim, you prove your point. Until you do, the A-theist holds the
>> high
>> ground.
>
> The previous poster is yet another idiot who imagines that the rest of
> the world revolves around his belief that his deity is real.
>
>> To use Carl Sagan's analogy, you walk up to me and claim that there
>> is a
>> dragon in your garage. I've said nothing about anything to this
>> point,
>> but I ask you to show me.  You open the garage door and I see
>> nothing.
>> You tell me "Oh, he's invisible". I propose several
tests to reveal
>> the
>> existance of this dragon of yours.  To every suggestion that I've
>> made
>> you have an answer as to why it won't work.  I can only conclude that
>> you're delusional and walk away unconvinced of your claim of a
>> dragon in
>> your garage. That makes me an A-dragonist.
>
> And in the theist's mind, you are utterly and unreasonably convinced
> the self-evident dragon which all reasonable people believe in,
> doesn't exist.
>
> However many times you explain it.
>
>>>      The point I've been trying to make is that one can not prove
>>> any religious belief system (or lack of same) to be correct or
>>> incorrect.
>>>      Sadly, Jonez just vanishes for while when I bring this up.
>
> And like most of them he can't grasp how stupid he shows himself.
>


Kent Wills ain't the sharpest tool in the shed, whether it be his absurd
assertions of U$ Law or his cloyingly wretched assertions of his murderous,
hateful, genocidal "god".

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag