| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: JAM versus Squish? |
KW> I'm running Synchronet now with its proprietary message base. I'm KW> playing with Mystic and debating whether JAM or SQUISH (and their KW> respective tossers) are a better choice. Does anyone have experience KW> with both you'd like to share? If you are going to use Mystic then you should use JAM because the author may be removing Squish in the next version. No one really uses Squish with Mystic. KW> I used Squish for years with Maximus, and miss the variety of third KW> party apps for stats, logging, netmail routing, etc. I know both have KW> third-party apps, any experience with those would be helpful, too. I think JAM is considered to have better 3rd party support these days. In the case of Mystic, you don't need any 3rd party software as it has a tosser and mailer built it, but you can still use 3rd party stuff if you want to. --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A1 (Windows)* Origin: Sector 7 [Mystic BBS WHQ] (1:129/215) SEEN-BY: 203/0 633/267 280 640/384 1384 690/682 712/620 848 770/1 @PATH: 129/215 154/10 203/0 640/384 712/848 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.