Hi RICH, as you were just saying about Re: Home Security....
RG> RG>> Yep, but the "standard" for trained law enforcement is different
RG> RG>> then the standard that is set for Joe Citizen.  Which means Joe
RG> RG>> Citizen that could shoot better then I (and there are a bunch of
RG> RG>> them out there) even with training records and such, wouldn't be
RG> RG>> held to the same standard I am.
RG> 
RG>  RT> I assume that you mean the standard of public opinon.  I know of no
RG>  RT> difference in the law.
RG> 
RG> Our Attorney General made it very clear to us when it comes 
RG> to a tort claim, if
RG> we don't toe the mark we may walk away alive, but loose a lot in
RG> the long run. If we deviate from policy, the AG will not defend us. 
RG> And if we stick to our training, we should be fine...
RG> 
RG> That includes if we shoot someone in our house during a burglary,
RG> while off duty (which we never are...) 
I want everyone to be judged the same (if that is possible).  That
means that the same laws apply to me that apply to law enforcement and
vice versa.  I cannot speak for the local policies that are set by
one's employer whether private or public.
RD 
sandman@azstarnet.com - A newspaper ISP - Arizona Daily Star
sandman@brassroots.org - A no compromise gun rights organization.
http://www.azstarnet.com/~sandman
___
 X KWQ/2 1.2i X Locked my coathanger in the car.  Good thing I had a key!
--- Maximus/2 3.01
---------------