wrote in message
news:982541864.3a9066280b151@webmail.cotse.com...

> >> >All of this sounds like a personal problem, to me.
>
> >> I imagine you spend most of your time going around and imagining
personal
> >> problems in people.  Perhaps it's because you can't find or have
trouble
> >> relating to people.
>
> >Still lacking reading comprehension skills, aren't you?  I said "sounds
> >like", it's an observation, dumbass.
>
> And how exactly is that excuse suppose to prove your failing position?
What I
> said still stands undefended, what's yer next move, oh game master?

Dense today, aren't you?

I need defend nothing.  I made an observation based on your statements.  No
imagining involved.

> >> >Because we can, moron.
>
> >> You can also kill yourself, moron.
>
> >If you are so bored, leave, dumbshit.
>
> What does your presumption that I'm bored have to do with the fact that
you can
> kill yourself just as easily as you can attempt to flame?

You may take the chicken way out if you choose.  I certainly won't stop you.

> >> It's obvious that you have some troubles paying attention as I just
said
> >> that I don't care, that it doesn't affect me.
>
> >Sure, boy.  If it didn't "affect" you, why are you explaining all your
> >problems?
>
> You're confused.  I'm pointing you your stupidity, if you don't realize
that by
> now, you must be doing something wrong.

You made the "unaffected" claim.  If it doesn't affect you, why are you
telling us of your problems?

> >You don't get a damn thing, dumbass.  It's all about the specific line
> >stated.  Each new conversation is a new "game".
>
> Maybe the reason you're so fixated on calling everything a game is because
you
> want to try and escape reality because it's just too much for you to deal
with.

It's a diversion and something I do for entertainment.

> >You haven't been weakened, you never had any strength to start with.
>
> >> >> You see the "game" to me seems pointless now.  Why?  Because I don't
care
> >> >> anymore.  I've been lying to myself for a few months now, trying to
make
> >> >> myself care.  But I can't hide the truth anymore.  When any of you
people
> >> >> try and flame me, I feel nothing.  Even when I create the most
savoring
> >> >> flame worthy
>
> >> >If you feel something other than entertained, stupid, you aren't
playing the
> >> >game properly.  Most of the time, I laugh.
>
> >> Your posts are pretty laughable, huh?
>
> >PKB, boy.
>
> I'm sorry, do you think PKB accusations somehow improve your flaming
technique?

I said -you- were laughable, you came right back with the same statement.
You aren't smart enough to see that, apparently.

> >> >I've laughed at you when you
> >> >first stuck your head in here.
>
> >> What group are you talking about newbie?  Or do you even know?  See,
this is
> >> probably what annoys me the most, stupid people.  I mean, it's like all
the
> >> good debaters and flamists are history, they've all moved on to other
groups
> >> or simply grew out of it and people like this d00d are all that's left.
I
> >> mean he's so fuckin stupid he doesn't even realize this is being posted
to
> >> about a dozen or so groups.
>
> >In the group *I* am in.  You came in to MY domain.  You figure it out,
> >dumbass.
>
> I didn't ask you backpedal poorly you know.

No backpedal.  You puffed up in -my- newsgroup.  You got slammed.

> >> >I've done nothing but laugh at you since
> >> >then.  I probably won't ever do anything but laugh at you.  You've
been
> >> >pathetic from the start.
>
> >> It's too bad there isn't a Mojo Jojo award cause then you'd have
something to
> >> show for your stupidity.
>
> >Still watching cartoons, boy?  My -kids- are beyond the Powerpuff Girls
and
> >have been for years.
>
> I'm fairly sure the Cartoon Network didn't come out with that cartoon
until
> like one year ago.  So either yer "-kids-" are completely stupid, or you
are,
> which do you prefer?

And this has bearing, how?  If they are too old and have been for years,
what does the time frame of the cartoon's inception have to do with
anything?

> >The only reason I know what you are talking about is
> >because my nephews are still of an age to watch that crap.
>
> Wow, a backpedal at the time of execution, haven't seen that tactic in a
while.

I visit my nephews.  Strange idea, isn't it?

> >> >You don't make me angry, you don't upset me, and
> >> >you don't get on my nerves.  NONE of your "goals" have worked.
>
> >> If that were so true why bother telling me so?  I mean there's a
difference
> >> between what I did and what you're doing.  What I did was openly and
non
> >> directively say that flaming doesn't affect me.  You are specifically
> >> directing a defense towards my words rather than just speak from an
open
> >> platform. For instance if say Checkmate were to post something to me
and I
> >> responded directly to him and told HIM that HE did not bother me it's
> >> obvious that he did, otherwise I wouldn't be trying to use it as a
defensive
> >> tactic.
>
> >No difference at all.
>
> So you say without actually pointing out why.  Not really much of a
surprise
> though, after all, you're only trying to win a "game" using inverted
stupidity
> as a primer.  You post one thing without thinking, then when you're made
to
> look stupid you backpedal onto yourself without explanation or proof.

You can't read worth a fuck, boy.

> >You are in here claiming your immunity to such things.
>
> Immunity, huh?  For 100 points who wants to point out where Stupid slurped
that
> word up from?

Right here, dumbass:  What I did was openly and non directively say that
flaming doesn't affect me.

That is a claim of immunity.  If you are immune to something, it doesn't
affect you, moron.

> >You have repeatedly made claims about getting under someone else's
> >skin while never realizing that you are nothing more than laughable to
any
> >and all involved.
>
> I seem to be getting at you so bad you're sitting glued to the monitor
awaiting
> my next post so you can respond to it in less than 30 sedonds.

Hardly.  I'm busy configuring a Linux box to add to the network.  I am just
using -this- machine to access the help files available for use on the web.

> >> >Boy, in the flame groups, we -especially- attack those we know.
>
> >> I'm sure you'd attack a stuffed teddy bear if you thought it'd help you
to
> >> relieve some of that pent up anger that's plaguing you.  I know why you
flame
> >> little one, you flame because of yer life.  You get shit on all day
long in
> >> real life so you come to the Inet to try and equalize the pressure.  If
it
> >> weren't for the Inet, you'd have probably killed yourself months ago.
>
> >It's a -game-, dumbass.  If any of it bothered me, I'd have quit ten or
more
> >years ago.
>
> You know, an intelligent person might be bothered by the fact that they
suck at
> the "-game-", but apparently intelligence ins't a word that can be applied
to
> you, huh?

Intelligent has always been a word applied to me.  What's your excuse?

> >> >> Does that mean I'm not going to post to Usenet anymore?  No, I'll
still
> >> >> post.  I'll still flame people to.  But from now on, it's on my
terms.
> >> >> If someone
>
> >> >You need to -start- flaming, Bed Wetter.  Nothing I've seen out of you
to
> >> >date even comes close.
>
> >> And what date would that be little one?  Last week?  I mean I'm all for
> >> bandwagon jumpers who think the entire history of Usenet spans over
three
> >> months, but come on, try and get it figured the fuck out.
>
> >ANY date.  Try since your conception.
>
> Oh so you're saying you've been stalking me since my conception, huh?
Well, I
> think perhaps that's taking obsession a bit too far, why don't you try
getting
> a new hobby little one?  Perhaps something less aggravating to you.

Stalking?  ROFL!  You can't understand simple English.  "To date" has a
completely different meaning to those of us with a command of the language.

> >> >> tries to flame me or claim SPNAK, they only lose.  Why?  Because I
don't
> >> >> care.
>
> >> >For the same reason, anyone you claim SPANK on can shrug it off
because
> >> >you've not managed it.
>
> >> I don't believe in SPANK, I think it's a cowardly tactic when you
believe in
> >> it.  I sometimes use it in a trolling sense if I want to invoke mass
posting,
> >> but that's it.
>
> >Bullshit.  You've claimed it again and again.
>
> What did I just say kitten?  Here let me say it again so you'll have a
chance
> to backpedal in a more plausible way.  I sometimes use the claim of SPANK
to
> invoke mass posting from a trolling perspective.  Now this time if you're
going
> to try and claim that I used it as a flaming attack try and at least find
some
> way of backing yourself up with some evidence.

You backpedaled, moron.  You don't believe in it, yet you use it.  You sound
like a TV Evangelist.  It's one of those "Do as I say, not as I do" things,
isn't it?

> >No, I will not look it up.
>
> Of course you won't, Stupid.  Deja is history.  Last I checked Google said
I
> had like 382 posts.  Dang, huh?  I mean isn't it funny how the destruction
of
> Deja pretty much just eliminated nearly 9/10ths of your entire flame base?
Not
> to mention all the other pathetic morons out there who rely on Deja to
make up
> for what they lack in wit.

I don't use Deja and never have.  You'll have to point your finger elsewhere
for that one.

> >> >Get over it, moron.
>
> >> If you're not fucking up, you're not doing anything.  You might want to
keep
> >> that in mind.
>
> >I fuck up all the time.
>
> Autoflame grade: A+
>
> >It's simply a matter of convincing her to get on top.
>
> Let's just leave your sister out of this, okay?  `, )

Nice post edit.

What's next, mommy flames?