| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: ATM 4.25` F/4 |
From: "Jack Schmidling" To: Reply-To: "Jack Schmidling" From: "Dwight K. Elvey" > I assume you are talking about a Newton. If so, the shadow > should be off center for both inside and outside of focus. > This is called offset. An F/4 will have noticeable offset. > Can you be more specific? What type of telescope are you talking > about...... This is a 4.25" f4 Newt. It has a 1.8" diagonal and I am trying to fully illuminate the chip on my MX716 camera which is about .5". I have positioned all the components as they should be including a .14" offset to compensate for the foreshortening effect. Looking through the peep hole it looks exactly like the drawing in Suiter's book. Problem is that when I tweek the collimation on a star centered in the field, it is not collimated when I go to the other side of focus. I ended up sort of offsetting the view by the same amount on each side but this is rather disconcerting. A short image of the a star field slightly out of focus shows the central stars with the diagonal in the center and all the rest sort of point to the center. This is as it should be but I do understand why a central star does not look collimated on each side of focus visually. js --- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4* Origin: Email Gate (1:379/100) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/100 1 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.