From: "Patriot Games" 

"Dionisio"  wrote in message
news:460c684f$0$17159$4c368faf{at}roadrunner.com...
> Patriot Games wrote:
>> "Dionisio"  wrote:
>>>Patriot Games wrote:
>>>>"Dionisio"  wrote:
>>>>>God never married.
>>>>God isn't human, the concept doesn't apply.
>>>So? Zeus did. Heck, a great many other deities got hitched.
>> That undocumented item apparently did not cause God to want to get
>> married...
> Actually, it was rather widely known.
> But you're right -- "Elat" notwithstanding -- God never married.
> That some would claim marriage to be sacred in His eyes has always
> been a source of some amusement.

To you...

>>>Or is this a case of "do as I say, not as I do"?
>> God isn't human, the concept doesn't apply.
> God doesn't know the concept of "I" can apply to Him? Now that's
> interesting...

If there's only one God who then would that God marry?  The concept doesn't apply.

>>>Would Jesus do?
>> What part of "Immaculate Conception" should I explain first?
> How about the part wherein a parthenogenic pregnancy would result in a
> female?

Apparently God chose male.  I don't think the Bible explains why.

> Go ahead. We're all ears.

See above.

>>>Oh, it gets better: He's living with a Ghost. Shirley McClain, eat your
>>>heart out.
>> Not "a" Ghost, THE Ghost.  Unfortunately for your point
the Holy Ghost is
>> here, with us, NOT living somewhere with God.
> Ah. Limiting an important part of God to your own human understanding?

Just passing on what the Bible says.

> Hmm... Not bad. Keep it up.
> But about that logical fallacy regarding an omnipresent being not being
> able to
> reside wherever it so chooses...

Who invented "not being able?"  You did.

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag