From: "Unsaved White Trash" 


"Velvet Elvis"  wrote in message
news:7lkq03ddm74aph4i030guebltcugrhqpdt{at}4ax.com...
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 10:35:07 -0700, "Unsaved White Trash"
>  wrote:
>
>>
>>"St. Jackanapes" 
wrote in message
>>news:qg2mc.riu.17.1{at}news.alt.net...
>>>
>>> In alt.flame.jesus.christ, Unsaved White Trash said...
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Father Haskell" 
wrote in message
>>>> news:1174855330.246711.214920{at}b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>>>> > On Mar 11, 1:38 am, St. Jackanapes
 wrote:
>>>> >> In alt.flame.jesus.christ, the sobriety of Father
Haskell was
>>>> >> questioned
>>>> >> when they said...
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > On Mar 10, 6:40 pm, St. Jackanapes

>>>> >> > wrote:
>>>> >> > > In alt.flame.jesus.christ, the sobriety
of Father Haskell was
>>>> >> > > questioned
>>>> >> > > when they said...
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > > > On Mar 10, 12:08 am, St. Jackanapes
>>>> >> > > > 
>>>> >> > > > wrote:
>>>> >> > > > > In alt.flame.jesus.christ,
the sobriety of Father Haskell
>>>> >> > > > > was
>>>> >> > > > > questioned
>>>> >> > > > > when they said...
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > > > > > On Mar 6, 7:12 pm, St. Jackanapes
>>>> >> > > > > >

>>>> >> > > > > > wrote:
>>>> >> > > > > > > In
alt.flame.jesus.christ, the sobriety of Father
>>>> >> > > > > > > Haskell
>>>> >> > > > > > > was
>>>> >> > > > > > > questioned
>>>> >> > > > > > > when they said...
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > > > > > > > On Mar 5, 4:28
am, St. Jackanapes
>>>> >> > > > > > > >

>>>> >> > > > > > > > wrote:
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > In
alt.flame.jesus.christ, the sobriety of Father
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > Haskell
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > was questioned
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > when they said...
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > On
Mar 4, 11:19 pm, St. Jackanapes
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >

>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
In alt.flame.jesus.christ, the sobriety of e was
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
questioned when they
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > said...
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> "St. Jackanapes"
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> 
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> wrote in
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> messagenews:oc14i.cht.17.1{at}news.alt.net...
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > Father Haskell vomited up the following vile
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > mess...
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> Map searches on all map servers return a
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> street
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> intersection when
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> queried for 5701 Mableton Parkway.  There's
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> an
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> office building of
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> some sort, with an empty parking lot, but
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> that
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> comes up as 5710
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> Mableton.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > I've been offline for a bit, so I'm not sure
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > who
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > you're referring to.
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > But to guess, are you referring to Dr.
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > Chung's
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > imaginary office
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > building?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> NOPE ! ! ! jackanapes of da pit. He's
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> referring
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > > to
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> ur new home
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> location, just dig about 4000 miles deep, in
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> hell.
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > > :-:
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> We'll be updating
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
> http://www.voy.com/20630/soon!(-;
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
What am I to do with this homosexual stalker,
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > Father?
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
Every time I get
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
back home from one of my stressful international
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
business conferences
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
sit down at my PC to relax and post in AFJC,
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > here's
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
this gay guy
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
harassing me for sick cult sex! He sends me
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > sexually
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
propositional
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
emails from his alter-ego "Alice" - and signs me
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > up
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
for perverted
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
newsletters. Then, as you notice in his reply
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > just
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
above, he's going to
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
go to my forum and post things from "Alice" -
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > he's
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
got a really sick
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
homo obsession with me - an online stalker that
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > I'm
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
afraid - terrified
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
actually - will turn into real world stalking
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > and
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
endanger my loving
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
family and maybe even my job in the publishing
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
industry. What do I do,
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
Father? What is a heterosexual Catholic boy
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > (lapsed)
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
do to protect
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
himself and family from this electronic
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > >
terrorism?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > Have
you discussed this person with the kind
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > Reverend
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
Phred Felps, perhaps arranging a public meeting
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > between
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > the two?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > > > > > > > >  But of course... Mine eyes were
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > open
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > but
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > I could not
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > see! Yes!
They're a proverbial match made in Heaven,
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > by
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > God! I'll fix
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > the two
of them up as a blind date, speaking of
>>>> >> > > > > > > > >
debilitated eyes, and
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > once Rev.
Phred figures out what his date is,
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > Loiodice
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > will be off my
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > back
permanently - uh, I mean that figuratively, of
>>>> >> > > > > > > > > course!
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > > > > > > > Get 'em both
roaring drunk.  Dress Loidice in a
>>>> >> > > > > > > > "Little
>>>> >> > > > > > > > Bo
>>>> >> > > > > > > > Peep"
>>>> >> > > > > > > > costume,
complete with sheep.  Felps might never
>>>> >> > > > > > > > figure
>>>> >> > > > > > > > it
>>>> >> > > > > > > > out.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > > > > > > The only problem
with that is that Phelps might spend
>>>> >> > > > > > > all
>>>> >> > > > > > > of
>>>> >> > > > > > > his time
>>>> >> > > > > > > trying to fuck the
sheep, and never get around to
>>>> >> > > > > > > cornholing
>>>> >> > > > > > > Little Bo
>>>> >> > > > > > > Loiodice.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > > > > > That always happens when
you mix liquor, Viagra, and Phred
>>>> >> > > > > > Felps.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > > > > Oh well, even if it doesn't
work out, it will still look
>>>> >> > > > > good
>>>> >> > > > > on
>>>> >> > > > > YouTube.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > > > You don't say?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > > > Someone forge a video, just for
the fun of it.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > > Can you fuck with videos like you can
fuck with photos using
>>>> >> > > Photoshop?
>>>> >> > > Is there something like Videoshop out
there? My entry into the
>>>> >> > > video
>>>> >> > > world came to a screeching halt about a
year ago when my JVC
>>>> >> > > GR-DVM75
>>>> >> > > (http://tinyurl.com/35m84e) refused to
take the digital tape
>>>> >> > > into
>>>> >> > > its
>>>> >> > > belly. And of course I don't have the
cash to get it fixed.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > A shaky, out-of-focus camera worked fine for
Faces of Death.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> It sure as hell did. That crappy video with faked
cannibal scenes
>>>> >> made
>>>> >> fucking millions. If I'd had the video cam back
then I could have
>>>> >> made
>>>> >> much better stuff and outsold those guys. A lot
of it was just
>>>> >> laughable, but people ate it up!
>>>> >
>>>> > A lot of National Geographic "Africa
documentaries" were shot
>>>> > on the back lots of Hollywood, with the actresses paid extra to
>>>> > go topless.
>>>> >
>>>> they got paid more when their boobies were hanging closest to their
>>>> navels.
>>>
>>> Well, back in those days they didn't have those Howard Hughes designed
>>> "lift & separate" Jane Russell bras. In the 20's
they hardly sold what
>>> we think of as a bra, did they? They just kinda wrapped some linen
>>> material around their tits a few times, making them look flat. Women
>>> with huge milk jugs used those corset kinda things with a big shelf
>>> welded on to lay the udders upon. Both ways didn't do much to counteract
>>> the ever-present force of gravity.
>>>
>>> So the women of the time, be they naked African Wah-toot-zees of the
>>> high savanna or wealthy matronly DAR women of New York high society, all
>>> had one degree or another of the breasts tendencies to try and touch
>>> their toes. This saved movie producers milk buckets full of cash to use
>>> on special effects. All they had to do was raid the Little Nubia section
>>> of LA with horsemen wearing gorilla costumes and tossing nets. These
>>> National Geographic documentaries were a great relief to puberty
>>> tormented male teens the world over ever since.
>>
>>My father always had a Nat Geog and a copy or Scientific American on the
>>back of our toilet.
>>Porno was hard to come by (awww, a pun) and he was a brainiac.
>
> Yep.  The best I could come up with, until I found my stepfather's stash,
> was
> the latest copy of National Geographic, with another load of African
> tube-sock
> titties.
>
heh heh...  I'd scour the Nat Geos to see some naked boobies and I'd be so
disappointed if there weren't any.  I did get hold of a TJ Bible when I was
about 11, I was sooooooooo shocked!!! I can't imagine what 11 yr olds think
today when they see real porno all over the place, just the cartoons
freaked me out.

> --
> You found God?
> If nobody claims him in 30 days,
> he's yours.

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag