RE: Republican Party
TO: Robert Plett (1:170/1701.10)
RP>  That "lesser of two evils" approach, along with the "big tent"
RP>  philosphy, has produced a party that, like Coors says, stands for
RP>  nothing, and which increasing numbers of folks of principle find
RP>  themselves no longer able to stomach being associated with.
But they are trying not to loose their seats, and if the republicans loose,  
who else will be in goverment?
and it will be much worse.
RP>  In the name of political pragmatism, the Republican Party has decided to
RP>  embrace all of its "friends" who advocate the most heinous forms of
RP>  infanticide.  In trying to stand for everything, you have made a mockery
RP>  of the platform and sent a clear message that the Republican Party
RP>  stands for nothing.  What's next:  Republicans for Socialism,
RP>  Republicans for Ethnic Cleansing, Republicans for Pedophilia?  I am too
RP>  ashamed for words to express how I feel about my long association with
RP>  the Republican Party.
RP>  
RP>  Sincerely,
RP>   - signed -
Well Republicans are against Partial Birth Abortion. And unlike The United  
Kingdom, anyone could run as a republican or a democrat or even a 
ertarian!
    
--- WWIVToss v.1.39.3 Registered 
---------------