On Nov 6, 11:12=A0am, "Bill Buckels"  wrote:
> [...]
> Unless you start extolling the virtues of Aztec C and showering me with
> praise, since the screen shots obviously show what I used for my exercise=
 I
> will need to consider your comments mere frivolity and you a hopeless
> malcontent until the next revision:)

You might have me confused with other Schmidts. :-)

> Seriously though, thanks for taking a look. So I take it there wasn't muc=
h
> obviously wrong with this whole confusing mess... just a lack of obvious
> endorsements.

What's interesting to me is that you're exposing and overcoming the
shortcoming that none of our image manipulation tools support writing
to CP/M disk images.  If they did, you could boil all of this down to
"Ctrl-C and Ctrl-V."  (Plus the header stripping, but that could be
built into the CP/M support of the image manipulator, I suppose.)
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32