From: Dionisio 

Patriot Games wrote:

> "Dionisio"  wrote:
>>But you're right -- "Elat" notwithstanding -- God never married.
>>That some would claim marriage to be sacred in His eyes has always
>>been a source of some amusement.
>
> To you...

True.

>>God doesn't know the concept of "I" can apply to Him? Now that's
>>interesting...
>
> If there's only one God who then would that God marry?  The concept doesn't
> apply.

"If"? You have the gall to say "if"? Sheesh! The Bible
records the names of many and
various other gods. Some of them female and known for their specialization
in the realm of
fertility...

"If" indeed...


>>How about the part wherein a parthenogenic pregnancy would result in a
>>female?
>
> Apparently God chose male.  I don't think the Bible explains why.

Yoo, hoo! Can you say "miracle"?

The following quote seems appropriate: "Oh Ye of little faith..."


>>Ah. Limiting an important part of God to your own human understanding?
>
> Just passing on what the Bible says.

Yes. You've passed on many points. Have your excuses ready.


>>Hmm... Not bad. Keep it up.
>>But about that logical fallacy regarding an omnipresent being not being
>>able to reside wherever it so chooses...
>
> Who invented "not being able?"  You did.

Oh? It was I who limited the abode of the Holy Spirit to the material
plane? Nope. Don't
think so. That was all you.


--
And the Thought of the Moment (TM) is:

                     ___                    "Engage."
        ___....-----'---`-----....___
   =======================================  "Oh, Jean-Luc! I knew you'd come
         ___`---..._______...---'___         around! I'll have Troi start
        (___)      _|_|_|_      (___)        the arrangements immediately!"
          \\____.-'_.---._`-.____//
            ~~~~`.__`---'__.'~~~~            
                    ~~~~~

(Brought to you by SigChanger. http://www.phranc.nl)

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag