From: The Chief Instigator 

"John D.Wentzky"  writes:

>In news:szkhcs2eu81.fsf{at}eris.io.com,
>The Chief Instigator  typed:
>> "John D.Wentzky"  writes:

>>> In news:szkwt0z2t8q.fsf{at}eris.io.com,
>>> The Chief Instigator  typed:
>>>> Douglas Berry  writes:

>>>>> On  Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:22:54 -0400 there was an
Ancient "John
>>>>> D.Wentzky" 
who stoppeth one in
>>>>> alt.atheism

>>>>>> The charges must be legitimate for it to make it to court.

>>>>> They are.

>>>>>> The charges are false.

>>>>> That will be decided by a jury. Honestly, after
hearing testimony
>>>>> from the police and seeing you on the stand, I'd expect a guilty
>>>>> verdict in under an hour.

>>>> ...and in his case, that might include the time of the trial.

>>>>>> I had to defend myself against an ignorant
offended youngster cop
>>>>>> who had no idea how to treat someone who broke no
law and who is
>>>>>> old enough to have sired him.

>>>>> So, you admit you resisted arrest?

>>>> He admitted it,

>>> I did not say I resisted arrest, because I didn't resist arrest.

>> Thanks to your chronic inability to understand what you read, you
>> resisted arrest - as defined by policy and statute.

>I did NOT resist arrest, you idiot.

The APD and ACSD seem to disagree with you.

>There is nothing written that says I resisted arrest other than the false
>charge that Giovanni levied against me.

What about video?

>>>> even if he didn't realize the meaning of what he
>>>> posted.

>>> The meaning of what I posted was I exercised my legal right to self
>>> defense against a junior disrespectful cop named Giovanni who
>>> attacked me from behind.
>>> I also had to defend myself against cops who began beat me with their
>>> batons.

>> ...which means you were posing more than a normal danger to Giovanni.

>No, it doesn't.
>What it means is all the people who beat me violated my rights at law.

Shut up until you're on trial, then.

>Giovanni, assaulted me from behind me, you scumbag.
>Why do you think cops are supposed to ride around in gangs while their lad
>asshole criminal shithead attacks members of the public?

I don't "think" as you do, but then, I'm not insane.

>Every person who assaulted me is guilty.
>I was fully within my rigths at law to defend myself against any and all
>persons who attacked me.
>Your illegal mafia bullshit is criminal.

*yawn*  Have fun spending the rest of your life in a room with rubber walls,
then.

>>>> The jury deliberations (assuming it gets that far) are likely to be
>>>> unusually quick.

>>> As far as putting cops behind bars, you are correct.
>>> It won't be me who stand trial, you criminal.

>> Your name is the one on the indictment, Perry Mason.

>There is no Indictment, idiot.

It's being processed, Loony Toon Wentzky.

>> You're the defendant.

>I'm not on trial, idiot.

That day will come (unless your counsel cobbles together a plea bargain,
which apparently happened the last time you were in for indecent exposure).

>>> If there is any trial from this incident it will be the criminal cops
>>> standing trial who committed crimes against me.  Your cirminal
allegiance
>>> is clear, or is it only your idiocy that is clear to us?

>> Your insanity is as subtle as a Cat 5 hurricane, Wentzky.

>Your insanity does not absolve any cop of any crime they committed.

I'm not the one who's going to spend the rest of my life in a jail (or
hospital) cell.  You, to all appearances, are doing just that.

--
   Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick{at}io.com)  Houston, Texas
    chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php  (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
                  LAST GAME:  Omaha 10, Houston 2 (March 24)
                 NEXT GAME: Friday, March 30 vs. Peoria, 7:35

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag