-=>> Thus spake Frank Filippone unto Tom Przeor <=-

[...]

 SK>  Your reply here confuses me somewhat.

Tom was saying that the Dynalink was better than the Sportster because it
connected at 33.6k, (or 31.2k), while the Sportster only connected at
28.8k.

I replied by stating that while the Dynalink connected at a faster speed,
the fact that the Sportster could use V.42bis would result in it
transferring data at a greater speed than the Dynalink with it's broken
V.42bis, (remember, we were talking about the Web, where lot's of stuff can
be compressed when being downloaded).

I then babbled on with some connection statistics to prove my point, which
have no doubt confused everyone who read them. I just re-read it, and even
I find it confusing :-)

Regards,
Frank


... Never underestimate the power of human stupidity.
--- GoldED 2.50+