From: St. Jackanapes 


In alt.flame.jesus.christ, Unsaved White Trash said...

>
> "Velvet Elvis"  wrote in message
> news:7lkq03ddm74aph4i030guebltcugrhqpdt{at}4ax.com...
> > On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 10:35:07 -0700, "Unsaved White Trash"
> >  wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>"St. Jackanapes" 
wrote in message
> >>news:qg2mc.riu.17.1{at}news.alt.net...
> >>>
> >>> In alt.flame.jesus.christ, Unsaved White Trash said...
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> "Father Haskell"
 wrote in message
> >>>> news:1174855330.246711.214920{at}b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> >>>> > On Mar 11, 1:38 am, St. Jackanapes
 wrote:
> >>>> >> In alt.flame.jesus.christ, the sobriety of
Father Haskell was
> >>>> >> questioned
> >>>> >> when they said...
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> > On Mar 10, 6:40 pm, St. Jackanapes

> >>>> >> > wrote:
> >>>> >> > > In alt.flame.jesus.christ, the
sobriety of Father Haskell was
> >>>> >> > > questioned
> >>>> >> > > when they said...
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> > > > On Mar 10, 12:08 am, St. Jackanapes
> >>>> >> > > > 
> >>>> >> > > > wrote:
> >>>> >> > > > > In
alt.flame.jesus.christ, the sobriety of Father Haskell
> >>>> >> > > > > was
> >>>> >> > > > > questioned
> >>>> >> > > > > when they said...
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> > > > > > On Mar 6, 7:12 pm,
St. Jackanapes
> >>>> >> > > > > >

> >>>> >> > > > > > wrote:
> >>>> >> > > > > > > In
alt.flame.jesus.christ, the sobriety of Father
> >>>> >> > > > > > > Haskell
> >>>> >> > > > > > > was
> >>>> >> > > > > > > questioned
> >>>> >> > > > > > > when they said...
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > On Mar 5,
4:28 am, St. Jackanapes
> >>>> >> > > > > > > >

> >>>> >> > > > > > > > wrote:
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > In
alt.flame.jesus.christ, the sobriety of Father
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > Haskell
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > was questioned
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > when
they said...
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
On Mar 4, 11:19 pm, St. Jackanapes
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >

> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> In alt.flame.jesus.christ, the sobriety of e was
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> questioned when they
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> said...
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > "St. Jackanapes"
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > 
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > wrote in
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > messagenews:oc14i.cht.17.1{at}news.alt.net...
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > Father Haskell vomited up the following vile
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > mess...
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> Map searches on all map servers return a
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> street
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> intersection when
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> queried for 5701 Mableton Parkway.  There's
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> an
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> office building of
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> some sort, with an empty parking lot, but
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> that
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> comes up as 5710
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> Mableton.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > I've been offline for a bit, so I'm not sure
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > who
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > you're referring to.
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > But to guess, are you referring to Dr.
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > Chung's
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > imaginary office
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > building?
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > NOPE ! ! ! jackanapes of da pit. He's
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > referring
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > to
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > ur new home
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > location, just dig about 4000 miles deep, in
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > hell.
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > :-:
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > We'll be updating
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > http://www.voy.com/20630/soon!(-;
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> What am I to do with this homosexual stalker,
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> Father?
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> Every time I get
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> back home from one of my stressful international
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> business conferences
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> sit down at my PC to relax and post in AFJC,
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> here's
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> this gay guy
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> harassing me for sick cult sex! He sends me
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> sexually
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> propositional
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> emails from his alter-ego "Alice" - and signs me
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > up
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> for perverted
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> newsletters. Then, as you notice in his reply
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > just
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> above, he's going to
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> go to my forum and post things from "Alice" -
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > he's
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> got a really sick
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> homo obsession with me - an online stalker that
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > I'm
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> afraid - terrified
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> actually - will turn into real world stalking
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > and
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> endanger my loving
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> family and maybe even my job in the publishing
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> industry. What do I do,
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> Father? What is a heterosexual Catholic boy
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> (lapsed)
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> do to protect
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> himself and family from this electronic
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> terrorism?
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
Have you discussed this person with the kind
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > > Reverend
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
Phred Felps, perhaps arranging a public meeting
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > > between
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > > the two?
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > >
 But of course... Mine eyes were
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > open
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > but
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > I could not
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > see!
Yes! They're a proverbial match made in Heaven,
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > by
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > God! I'll fix
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > the
two of them up as a blind date, speaking of
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > >
debilitated eyes, and
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > once
Rev. Phred figures out what his date is,
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > Loiodice
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > will be off my
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > back
permanently - uh, I mean that figuratively, of
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > > course!
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > Get 'em
both roaring drunk.  Dress Loidice in a
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > "Little
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > Bo
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > Peep"
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > costume,
complete with sheep.  Felps might never
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > figure
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > it
> >>>> >> > > > > > > > out.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> > > > > > > The only
problem with that is that Phelps might spend
> >>>> >> > > > > > > all
> >>>> >> > > > > > > of
> >>>> >> > > > > > > his time
> >>>> >> > > > > > > trying to fuck
the sheep, and never get around to
> >>>> >> > > > > > > cornholing
> >>>> >> > > > > > > Little Bo
> >>>> >> > > > > > > Loiodice.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> > > > > > That always happens
when you mix liquor, Viagra, and Phred
> >>>> >> > > > > > Felps.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> > > > > Oh well, even if it
doesn't work out, it will still look
> >>>> >> > > > > good
> >>>> >> > > > > on
> >>>> >> > > > > YouTube.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> > > > You don't say?
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> > > > Someone forge a video, just
for the fun of it.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> > > Can you fuck with videos like you
can fuck with photos using
> >>>> >> > > Photoshop?
> >>>> >> > > Is there something like Videoshop
out there? My entry into the
> >>>> >> > > video
> >>>> >> > > world came to a screeching halt
about a year ago when my JVC
> >>>> >> > > GR-DVM75
> >>>> >> > > (http://tinyurl.com/35m84e)
refused to take the digital tape
> >>>> >> > > into
> >>>> >> > > its
> >>>> >> > > belly. And of course I don't have
the cash to get it fixed.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> > A shaky, out-of-focus camera worked
fine for Faces of Death.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> It sure as hell did. That crappy video with
faked cannibal scenes
> >>>> >> made
> >>>> >> fucking millions. If I'd had the video cam
back then I could have
> >>>> >> made
> >>>> >> much better stuff and outsold those guys. A
lot of it was just
> >>>> >> laughable, but people ate it up!
> >>>> >
> >>>> > A lot of National Geographic "Africa
documentaries" were shot
> >>>> > on the back lots of Hollywood, with the
actresses paid extra to
> >>>> > go topless.
> >>>> >
> >>>> they got paid more when their boobies were hanging
closest to their
> >>>> navels.
> >>>
> >>> Well, back in those days they didn't have those Howard
Hughes designed
> >>> "lift & separate" Jane Russell bras. In the
20's they hardly sold what
> >>> we think of as a bra, did they? They just kinda wrapped some linen
> >>> material around their tits a few times, making them look
flat. Women
> >>> with huge milk jugs used those corset kinda things with a big shelf
> >>> welded on to lay the udders upon. Both ways didn't do
much to counteract
> >>> the ever-present force of gravity.
> >>>
> >>> So the women of the time, be they naked African
Wah-toot-zees of the
> >>> high savanna or wealthy matronly DAR women of New York
high society, all
> >>> had one degree or another of the breasts tendencies to
try and touch
> >>> their toes. This saved movie producers milk buckets full
of cash to use
> >>> on special effects. All they had to do was raid the
Little Nubia section
> >>> of LA with horsemen wearing gorilla costumes and tossing
nets. These
> >>> National Geographic documentaries were a great relief to puberty
> >>> tormented male teens the world over ever since.
> >>
> >>My father always had a Nat Geog and a copy or Scientific American on the
> >>back of our toilet.
> >>Porno was hard to come by (awww, a pun) and he was a brainiac.
> >
> > Yep.  The best I could come up with, until I found my stepfather's stash,
> > was
> > the latest copy of National Geographic, with another load of African
> > tube-sock
> > titties.
> >
> heh heh...  I'd scour the Nat Geos to see some naked boobies and I'd be so
> disappointed if there weren't any.  I did get hold of a TJ Bible when I was
> about 11, I was sooooooooo shocked!!!
> I can't imagine what 11 yr olds think today when they see real porno all
> over the place, just the cartoons freaked me out.

Kids are reaching puberty earlier and earlier these days. I can guess why.

--
 St. Jackanapes of Usenet ~ Bearer of The One True Liver ~
Ordained Minister & Holy Saint of The Universal Life Church John
"Melchizedek & Free Gift" Loiodice: SPNAKED! Wed, 28 Mar 2007
-----------------------------------------------------------------
WEBSITE:http://www.jackanapes.ws FORUM:http://www.voy.com/20630/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag