From: Velvet Elvis 

On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 14:03:40 -0700, "Unsaved White Trash"
 wrote:

>
>"Velvet Elvis"  wrote in message
>news:7lkq03ddm74aph4i030guebltcugrhqpdt{at}4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 10:35:07 -0700, "Unsaved White Trash"
>>  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"St. Jackanapes" 
wrote in message
>>>news:qg2mc.riu.17.1{at}news.alt.net...
>>>>
>>>> In alt.flame.jesus.christ, Unsaved White Trash said...
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Father Haskell"
 wrote in message
>>>>> news:1174855330.246711.214920{at}b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>>>>> > On Mar 11, 1:38 am, St. Jackanapes
 wrote:
>>>>> >> In alt.flame.jesus.christ, the sobriety of
Father Haskell was
>>>>> >> questioned
>>>>> >> when they said...
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> > On Mar 10, 6:40 pm, St. Jackanapes

>>>>> >> > wrote:
>>>>> >> > > In alt.flame.jesus.christ, the
sobriety of Father Haskell was
>>>>> >> > > questioned
>>>>> >> > > when they said...
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> > > > On Mar 10, 12:08 am, St. Jackanapes
>>>>> >> > > > 
>>>>> >> > > > wrote:
>>>>> >> > > > > In
alt.flame.jesus.christ, the sobriety of Father Haskell
>>>>> >> > > > > was
>>>>> >> > > > > questioned
>>>>> >> > > > > when they said...
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> > > > > > On Mar 6, 7:12 pm,
St. Jackanapes
>>>>> >> > > > > >

>>>>> >> > > > > > wrote:
>>>>> >> > > > > > > In
alt.flame.jesus.christ, the sobriety of Father
>>>>> >> > > > > > > Haskell
>>>>> >> > > > > > > was
>>>>> >> > > > > > > questioned
>>>>> >> > > > > > > when they said...
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > On Mar 5,
4:28 am, St. Jackanapes
>>>>> >> > > > > > > >

>>>>> >> > > > > > > > wrote:
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > In
alt.flame.jesus.christ, the sobriety of Father
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > Haskell
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > was questioned
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > when
they said...
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
On Mar 4, 11:19 pm, St. Jackanapes
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >

>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> In alt.flame.jesus.christ, the sobriety of e was
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> questioned when they
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> said...
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > "St. Jackanapes"
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > 
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > wrote in
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > messagenews:oc14i.cht.17.1{at}news.alt.net...
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > Father Haskell vomited up the following vile
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > mess...
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> Map searches on all map servers return a
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> street
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> intersection when
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> queried for 5701 Mableton Parkway.  There's
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> an
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> office building of
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> some sort, with an empty parking lot, but
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> that
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> comes up as 5710
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> Mableton.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > I've been offline for a bit, so I'm not sure
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > who
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > you're referring to.
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > But to guess, are you referring to Dr.
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > Chung's
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > imaginary office
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > building?
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > NOPE ! ! ! jackanapes of da pit. He's
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > referring
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > to
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > ur new home
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > location, just dig about 4000 miles deep, in
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > hell.
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > :-:
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > We'll be updating
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> > http://www.voy.com/20630/soon!(-;
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> What am I to do with this homosexual stalker,
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> Father?
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> Every time I get
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> back home from one of my stressful international
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> business conferences
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> sit down at my PC to relax and post in AFJC,
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> here's
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> this gay guy
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> harassing me for sick cult sex! He sends me
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> sexually
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> propositional
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> emails from his alter-ego "Alice" - and signs me
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > up
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> for perverted
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> newsletters. Then, as you notice in his reply
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > just
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> above, he's going to
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> go to my forum and post things from "Alice" -
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > he's
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> got a really sick
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> homo obsession with me - an online stalker that
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > I'm
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> afraid - terrified
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> actually - will turn into real world stalking
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > > and
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> endanger my loving
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> family and maybe even my job in the publishing
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> industry. What do I do,
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> Father? What is a heterosexual Catholic boy
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> (lapsed)
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> do to protect
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> himself and family from this electronic
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
> terrorism?
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
Have you discussed this person with the kind
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > Reverend
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > >
Phred Felps, perhaps arranging a public meeting
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > between
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > > the two?
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >
 But of course... Mine eyes were
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > open
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > but
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > I could not
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > see!
Yes! They're a proverbial match made in Heaven,
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > by
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > God! I'll fix
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > the
two of them up as a blind date, speaking of
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > >
debilitated eyes, and
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > once
Rev. Phred figures out what his date is,
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > Loiodice
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > will be off my
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > back
permanently - uh, I mean that figuratively, of
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > > course!
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > Get 'em
both roaring drunk.  Dress Loidice in a
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > "Little
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > Bo
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > Peep"
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > costume,
complete with sheep.  Felps might never
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > figure
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > it
>>>>> >> > > > > > > > out.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> > > > > > > The only
problem with that is that Phelps might spend
>>>>> >> > > > > > > all
>>>>> >> > > > > > > of
>>>>> >> > > > > > > his time
>>>>> >> > > > > > > trying to fuck
the sheep, and never get around to
>>>>> >> > > > > > > cornholing
>>>>> >> > > > > > > Little Bo
>>>>> >> > > > > > > Loiodice.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> > > > > > That always happens
when you mix liquor, Viagra, and Phred
>>>>> >> > > > > > Felps.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> > > > > Oh well, even if it
doesn't work out, it will still look
>>>>> >> > > > > good
>>>>> >> > > > > on
>>>>> >> > > > > YouTube.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> > > > You don't say?
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> > > > Someone forge a video, just
for the fun of it.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> > > Can you fuck with videos like you
can fuck with photos using
>>>>> >> > > Photoshop?
>>>>> >> > > Is there something like Videoshop
out there? My entry into the
>>>>> >> > > video
>>>>> >> > > world came to a screeching halt
about a year ago when my JVC
>>>>> >> > > GR-DVM75
>>>>> >> > > (http://tinyurl.com/35m84e) refused
to take the digital tape
>>>>> >> > > into
>>>>> >> > > its
>>>>> >> > > belly. And of course I don't have
the cash to get it fixed.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> > A shaky, out-of-focus camera worked fine
for Faces of Death.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> It sure as hell did. That crappy video with
faked cannibal scenes
>>>>> >> made
>>>>> >> fucking millions. If I'd had the video cam
back then I could have
>>>>> >> made
>>>>> >> much better stuff and outsold those guys. A
lot of it was just
>>>>> >> laughable, but people ate it up!
>>>>> >
>>>>> > A lot of National Geographic "Africa
documentaries" were shot
>>>>> > on the back lots of Hollywood, with the actresses
paid extra to
>>>>> > go topless.
>>>>> >
>>>>> they got paid more when their boobies were hanging
closest to their
>>>>> navels.
>>>>
>>>> Well, back in those days they didn't have those Howard
Hughes designed
>>>> "lift & separate" Jane Russell bras. In the
20's they hardly sold what
>>>> we think of as a bra, did they? They just kinda wrapped some linen
>>>> material around their tits a few times, making them look flat. Women
>>>> with huge milk jugs used those corset kinda things with a big shelf
>>>> welded on to lay the udders upon. Both ways didn't do much
to counteract
>>>> the ever-present force of gravity.
>>>>
>>>> So the women of the time, be they naked African Wah-toot-zees of the
>>>> high savanna or wealthy matronly DAR women of New York
high society, all
>>>> had one degree or another of the breasts tendencies to try and touch
>>>> their toes. This saved movie producers milk buckets full
of cash to use
>>>> on special effects. All they had to do was raid the Little
Nubia section
>>>> of LA with horsemen wearing gorilla costumes and tossing nets. These
>>>> National Geographic documentaries were a great relief to puberty
>>>> tormented male teens the world over ever since.
>>>
>>>My father always had a Nat Geog and a copy or Scientific American on the
>>>back of our toilet.
>>>Porno was hard to come by (awww, a pun) and he was a brainiac.
>>
>> Yep.  The best I could come up with, until I found my stepfather's stash,
>> was
>> the latest copy of National Geographic, with another load of African
>> tube-sock
>> titties.
>>
>heh heh...  I'd scour the Nat Geos to see some naked boobies and I'd be so
>disappointed if there weren't any.  I did get hold of a TJ Bible when I was
>about 11, I was sooooooooo shocked!!!

You can buy those on eBay, but as I recall, they aren't cheap.

>I can't imagine what 11 yr olds think today when they see real porno all
>over the place, just the cartoons freaked me out.

I'd be in hog heaven.  The same as I'd be if a female teacher came onto me.
 I don't know what's wrong with these 15 year olds today, whining about
some gorgeous math teacher blowing them in the janitor's closet.

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag