MARK PROBERT was thinking about marijuana & addicti [1/3 and keyed into 
cyberspace:
MP>GARY PETZ was thinking about marijuana & addicti [1/3 and keyed into 
MP>cyberspace:
MP>GP>I don't know where I'm coming into this discussion, but I want to
MP>GP>point out that we have very little hard research on marijuana
MP>GP>because of the irrationale, hysterical vendetta against it,
MP>GP>putting it in the same class with other "hard" drugs.  I wonder if
MP>GP>the strong policy that puts us almost in a policy state with
MP>GP>regard to drugs, might have been lent a lot of support by the war
MP>GP>in Viet Nam.    I want to to point out that hard evidence is not
MP>GP>going to an AA meeting and asking.  
MP>You are coming into this thread well after Jane has shown that she is
MP>adamant about researching medicinal use of marijuana. Jane does not
MP>want  facts, just diatribe.
MP>                ===>The Voice of Reason<===
MP>                     mark.probert@juno.com
MP> * CMPQwk #1.4 * UNREGISTERED EVALUATION COPY
MP>--- WM v3.10/92-0423
Damn. Answer one message about marijuana, and I did not even realize 
that I moved to South Carolina.
Maybe Jane is right.
                ===>The Voice of Reason<===
                     mark.probert@juno.com
---
 * CMPQwk #1.4 * UNREGISTERED EVALUATION COPY
---------------