"Dan Nelson"  wrote in message
news:3A97F94A.43DF4814@black-hole.com...
> "Mad Hatter�" wrote:
> >
>
> > Actually it was a blind estimate.  With your group snippage it's hard
> > to give an accurate number.  I think we started off with about ten.
> > Shall I add them back in for you, or was there some specific reason
> > you didn't want them there?
>
> Never snipped a group in this thread.  I rarely do, unless it's looking
> like I could get TOS'd over it, which is unlikely in any event, because
> I'm smart enough to cover tracks when being...mischievious.

He is just going to say something like "everyone else would be jumping up
and down screaming ..." and shit.  He is so predictable.

>
> > >Quantity != quality.  And I seem to see the real Mad Hatter post fairly
> > >often yet, albeit not under that nym.
> >
> > No, he doesn't post anymore actually.  If you think he does, you're an
> > idiot.
>
> We must be talking about different people.

This is where he will try to redirect who you would be talking about.

>
> > >Probably because some cretin
> > >decided to destroy its mystique.  
> >
> > Actually I'm increasing it.  Most would consider me to be the most
> > lethal and devastating troll in Usenet history.  No one can invoke the
> > kind of chaos and destruction I can.  I mean hell as we speak I have
> > nearly 22 people trying to flame against me and this has been a pretty
> > slow month cause I took a week off.  When I post into a group people
> > shut the fuck up and listen.  Take the Lego groups, when they found
> > out I was the Mad Hatter all hell broke loose.  They were so fuckin
> > paranoid they banned me off all their private news servers and sent
> > out hundreds of warning messages to all their members.  Or that e-book
> > newsgroup when I just sorta idly mentioned a way I could completely
> > destroy their online existence.  I mean you'd think I opened Pandora's
> > box or something.  YEESH, I can't remember a time when I had so many
> > complaints to Supernews.  In response Super kindly asked me not to
> > obliterate their pathetic little group, at which point I pointed out
> > that their charter was shit and they had no FAQ, thus, no rules.  So
> > you see, at this point I don't even need to DO anything.  I simply
> > need to show up and then just idly talk about doing something and
> > that's enough to send people tearing off into the streets in a panic.
>
> So you're the king of legos & e-books.  May I be the first to bow, your
> majesty?

This is where he calls you names and make lame claims to
be some king of post.  He will want to tell you all about how
he trolled vampire plonk...and then make threats about posting
in a scientologist group.

>
> > >Nyms mean nothing,
> >
> > You're right, they don't.  There have been lots of trolls who have
> > attempted forgeries in order to try and use my nyme as a means of
> > causing disruption.  And you know what?  It never seems to work for
> > them.  They never seem to create more than one or two posts.  Where as
> > when I make a post it has the likihood to spawn literally hundreds of
> > followups and dozens of thread offshoots.
>
> In the unlikely event your claim here is accurate, then you *have* seen
> some success trolling.
>

*Mad, why not insert more post flame war bs?  Put it right here in your
reply to
"Dan Nelson"*

> > I'm more of just an interesting guy too....but not to you.  I have no
> > interests in sharing anything of relevance with you, to me you are
> > nothing but a part of the collective whole that's trying so
> > desperately to try and get back at the mean ol Hatter for fuckin up
> > various parts of Usenet.
>
> You are correct, you're not particularly interesting to me.  But it's a
> slow day in the Flonk.  
>
> > Like I said, unless I'm using the Malkavian nyme I'm not flaming.
>
> Obviously.
>
> >  And
> > actually you're wrong, a good flamer can break a person so badly they
> > will leave Usenet permanently or become a hopeless obsessive forever
> > following up your posts with post edits, fuckheadness, and desperate
> > claims of SPNAK.
>
> All because they feel dumb, which is what I said.

Careful Dan, this is where he pulls out his ......mirror!!!! AHHHH!!!1!

>
> > to get under peoples skin.  A lot of what I say hits a little too
> > close to home in my opponents.
>
> Well, a lot of what you say is about as useful as a waterproof sponge,
> too, but I won't hold that against you.
>

> > You forgot to include critical thinking.  Logistical analysis can come
> > in handy.
>
> I suppose.

This will be where he will pull out the old kill yourself flame.  And try to
increase his psot count.

--
BuZZard