>> Possibly.  But Ward has made some grave errors that are 100%
 >> wrong.  His "interpretation" is wrong.  He tried to redefine
 >> the voting in a situation where it is clearly defined.

 WD> That is your "opinion".

 WD> However the IC has a 100% freedom to "interprete" as he/she
 WD> pleases whatever ¨he/she considers worthy of an
 WD> interpretation. By that virtue alone it ¨becomes a formal
 WD> part of policy until overruled.

 WD> I did not write those sections of policy, just used what was
 WD> available ¨to act within the confines of P4.

but you did not... you were already out by that time, ward... please quit
trying to destroy fidonet and let this crap drop in the shitter where it
belongs... maybe you could learn something from other recent activities
where folkkept pushing and pushing and now see that the price paid is much
too high...

)\/(ark