John, at 11:57 on Oct 27 1996, you wrote to David Drummond ...

DD>> Doesn't V.34 presume V.42?

JP>> I'm not certain. Surely it's possible to achieve a V.34 
JP>> connection without using V.42. Not a particularly good idea, 
JP>> but it must be possible.

DD>> Then why would I want to state the obvious?

JP> Assuming that V.34 does NOT imply V.42 ...

JP> Why not fly the flag to indicate that you support V.42?

I'm doing my part to keep the nodelist size down.  I consider it a
redundant flag when V.34 is flown.  It may be possible to do one without
the other but hardly likely.

David
@EOT:

--- Msgedsq/2 3.10