On 24 Mar 2005 07:29:43 -0800, "the messenjah"
 transparently proposed:

>
>
>Daedalus wrote:
>> On 24 Mar 2005 04:43:53 -0800, "the messenjah"
>> , wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >Chance Hopkins wrote:
>> >> "the messenjah"
 wrote in message
>> >> news:1111642234.397021.15360{at}g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> >> >
>http://www.townhall.com/columnists/kathleenparker/kp20050323.shtml
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> A friend of mine said recently:
>> >>
>> >> "In my 50 years of life, I have NEVER heard anyone
say they wanted
>to
>> >be
>> >> kept alive artificially as a vegetable."
>> >>
>> >> Can anyone here truthfully say they would like to be kept alive as
>a
>> >> vegetable, on life support?
>> >
>> >That's not what this story is about. But thanks for your comments.
>>
>> I think he was commenting on you and how you were proof that living
>as
>> a vegetable is a horrible existence.
>
>The story is not about me. You people still can't offer any intelligent
>comments. Not surprising...

What were these:

:But here are some FACTS not opinion:
:
:1. Terri Schiavo case is a private family matter.
:2. Politicians and the right to life are using it as a stalking horse
:to garner votes and publicity.
:3. There are NO new ethical or legal boundaries being drawn here.
:4. Congress is (specifically Frist) impotent in this case (something
:you are more than familiar with).
:5. The courts have ruled and Terri's wishes were recognized.
:6. Bill Frist will be running for president in 2008.
:7. Where were the RTL and Congress in the previous cases?

Point 1 you agreed and then refuted yourself.
Point 2 you disagreed and were slapped for being stupid.
Point 3 you avoided due to ignorance of the issues.
Point 4 you whined about YOU and avoided the point due to ignorance.
Point 5 you ignored due to ignorance of the issues.
Point 6 you said was untrue and got spanked by facts.
Point 7 you avoided due to ignorance of the issues.

Here try this on for size:
http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/03/15/lifesupport.baby.ap/

Where were you, Congress and the religious hypocrites while that was
going on?

No international debate here:
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2004/jul/04071404.html

Still waiting on some media blitz here:
http://www.cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=6992
Oh wait it was a man, not a photogenic woman...

Now backpedal your way out of this one or just toss a one liner and
run, again.

So when you can actually discuss the facts of the case and not the
rhetoric of the case do please try.


--

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/24/05 12:46:05 PM ---