Hello Mark,

>> I had resisted posting on the matter in the Mystic or BBBS echos as I
>> didn't want it to seem like I was bashing either piece of software.
>> But... Maybe if I do, it might draw more attention to the matter from
>> others. I feel it is important to note that I am also in discussion
>> with Kim on the matter.

> i'm guessing this is a binkp connection... mystic has its own binkp
>implementation... i don't know if it was written from scratch or borrowed from
>another project (eg: taurus or radius)... there may be an imlementation proble
> depending on which version of the binkp protocol is being used with BBBS
> connections... IREX has a partial implementation of some stuff and it wrecks
> havoc with others... mystic trying to work with IREX could be leading to this
> with BBBS and possibly others...
> that's an eWAG of course ;)

According to the logs from each:

Using: Mystic/1.12A33 binkp/1.0

Using: BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Toy-3 binkp/1.0

Jeff

--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Toy-3