14 Nov 16 19:25, you wrote to me:

 ml>> i saw it but i haven't had time to extract it and give it a play

 MK> I see your reply to Nick with cited ftsc documents which I plan to
 MK> reference once I get an opportunity to read them over and compare to
 MK> what I currently have.  Thank you for that.

you are welcome... my type 2+ stuff uses both of the named documents... i've
not tried a bare version of the initial 2+ stuff... AFAIK, none exists and it
is all a combination of both with the second one being the clarification
format...

nick should maybe also remember a conversation, if he read everything, in
either MYSTIC or one of the SYNC echos... but it may have been in FTSC_PUBLIC
or NET_DEV... anyway, the conversation was about how to get the point address
from a 2+ PKT... gotta check this field and if it contains blah then you have
to look in that field... new packages should place drek hare and do barf over
there...

now that i think about it, it may have been the document that Stephen Hurd
(Deuce) was working on... i should have a copy of that somewhere around here...
i don't think it has been submitted as a proposal yet, though... it does,
however, lay out things a bit clearer and includes some things barely known in
the past...

)\/(ark

Always Mount a Scratch Monkey
Do you manage your own servers? If you are not running an IDS/IPS yer doin' it
wrong...
... I call myself a gourmet; I'm really a gourmand.
---