JK>GP>I wonder from when comes your authority for making broad-based
JK>GP>claims about ill effects of Mariju AS I see it, the substance is
JK>GP>very understudied, becau of the abuse histeria.  We would be doing
JK>GP>ourselves a serve as a society to able to put it to study and real
JK>GP>find out what affects it has.  As I have se it used, I doubt what
JK>GP>you say, but anecdotal is all any of us have to make o claims.
JK>Gary, wake up.  I have quoted books that can be found today which are
JK>both factual and contain extensive material indicating that marijuana
JK>is actually much worse for the human body than nicotine ever thought
JK>of being.
They are books of lies. PERIOD!
JK>Go find these for yourself in any decent library unless some idiot
JK>has removed them from the shelves.
That's because they are outdated. 
Ever see "Reefer Madness"? You would use it as a factual documentary, 
I'm sure. There ARE new books, you know...new studies. FACTS are there, 
not "a nurse sat in a chair and looked at a kid that was WHACKED OUT on 
LOCO WEED, and that is why they started cutting their wrists" kinda 
observations.
---
* CMPQwk #1.42* UNREGISTERED EVALUATION COPY
--- HyperMail! v1.22
(1:203/1476)
---------------