Hello Matt!

21 Oct 03 21:20, Matt Bedynek wrote to Francois Thunus:

 FT>> as well as various *BSD for scalability. The winner is definitely the
 FT>> Linux 2.6 kernel, but FreeBSD is close behind. The article is quite

 MB> In my opinion, they should have used the RELENG_4 branch.  The reason 
 MB> is that the FreeBSD 5.x still has some work to do before its ready 
 MB> for server use.

Well, Linux 2.6 is not exactly recommended for production use, either. It's
just a question of what you consider as being "stable". Even some
Linux distributions (e.g. Debian) have very special ideas of what is
"stable".


Regards,
Gerrit

P.S.: I think FBSD 5.2 will be officially recommended for server use, and
it won't be long until it's ready.

--- Msged/BSD 6.0.0