TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: linux
to: MAURICE KINAL
from: NICHOLAS BOEL
date: 2016-11-13 18:44:00
subject: Re: two steps back

Hello Maurice,

On 13 Nov 16 23:26, Maurice Kinal wrote to mark lewis:

 MK> It can.  There are lossy archive/compression software especially the
 MK> ones that combine the two.  I won't even mention the ones that are
 MK> obsolete especially regarding datetime stamps.  However I doubt that
 MK> is the real issue but better to be safe than sorry.  It isn't like
 MK> there aren't already many horror stories about pkzip and the ilk.  I
 MK> see no good reason to tempt the fates.  Do you?

I only use infozip here. But you have been switched to no compression anyways.
I had forgoten you were originally set to that already when setting everything
up with HPT.

 MK> Having said that we'll never know since he already switched it back
 MK> but I haven't sent any more messages as I am waiting for confirmation
 MK> before sending any more test messages.  Also I wouldn't mind your
 MK> input about the type 2.2 routine I posted in a previous reply to you.

Both netmails you sent me were marked as bad, with this error from pktinfo:

"18:36:49  CapabilityWord error in following pkt! rtfm: IgnoreCapWord.
wrong or no pkt

.. and exactly the same for the other netmail, which when I checked them in vim
noticed you had sent one with a 2+ packet header, and the other with a 2.2
packet header.

Earlier today, I enabled that option (IgnoreCapWord) and tried re-processing
one of your mails marked bad. It then processed the packet, but informed me
again that it was a bad packed due to being addressed to 1:154/10.116, which is
not an active point system anywhere that I'm aware of, especially here.

So either you're including something else in there that is even causing hpt to
dislike your 2+ AND 2.2 packets (I am not having any issues with netmail from
anyone else so far, 3-4 netmails with Wilfred yesterday, and quite a few
Areafix netmails today linking my two systems back together after a week of
separation), or there is something else.

I'm definitely interested in further testing to get this figured out, and thank
you for the two test netmails. I hope to see more so we can get to the bottom
of this!

Regards,
Nick

... "Не знаю. Я здесь только работаю."
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20160827
* Origin: thePharcyde_ distribution system (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)

SOURCE: echomail via QWK@docsplace.org

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.