| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: births |
-=> Quoting Carol Shenkenberger to Nancy Backus on 02-11-07 16:45 <=- NB>>recent surge in the 14-16ish mothers lately, though... and those are NB>>certainly treated now as high-risk births, just because the mom is so NB>>young... with a corresponding higher risk for a possible section. CS> True. One part is a girl of 14 just doesnt have the fuller hip growth CS> right? That comes out in final form about 17 or so? That's generally true. Of course, there are some young ladies that are pretty well fully mature at an earlier age. Yes, the hip development is one of the major factors, and one that would affect risk/need for a C-section. I think there may also be a further hormonal development that occurs and makes it more likely that the baby would be properly nourished in utero without putting the young mother at as much risk nutritionally herself. CS> Sure. Vaginal delivery is best whenever possible. Less risky for the CS> mother. True 'natural' I guess is without painkillers and at home? And with family around... :) CS> Nothing wrong with that but if there is a complication, can be awkward CS> in the extreme as they may not be able to get the mother to the CS> hospital very fast? I suppose it would depend on the knowledge level CS> of those around assisting. A good mid-wife would presumably be able CS> to tell if there was a problem that needed the mother to get to the CS> hospital. Nowadays, if one is considering a home birth, it must be with a good midwife in attendence, with medical backup already set in place for a contingency plan. My sister planned home births for the last 4 of her 6... only one actually happened at home. The first one, the midwife got concerned during labor, and all was moved to the nearby hospital labor floor. The second one happened at home as planned. The third one, again, the midwife decided that she should go to the hospital before the labor was over. The final time, my sister developed pre-eclamsia, so was hospitalized for a few days even before labor started. That time, it was a very good thing that they were in the hospital already, as the infant went into fetal distress during the later stages of labor, and an emergency C-section was performed, quite successfully. Had that not been the last pregnancy my sister carried to term, she might well have (probably would have) tried again for a home birth... :) If the mother is already considered high-risk for any reason, it's highly unlikely that a planned home birth would be given an ok. The "whoops, here's the baby already" type, though, is a different story altogether! Our pastor's last baby was of the latter type... they were getting ready to get in the car to go to the hospital, when she got this very strange expression on her face, and he was just in time to catch the baby as he came out! Just then the friend who was going to stay with the other kids arrived, and she called 911. They rode in style to the hospital... Mother, baby and Dad all were fine... and the little one is now just about 2... :) ttyl neb ... WARNING!! SAFESEX.ZIP is a trojan ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.20 --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a* Origin: FidoTel & QWK on the Web! www.fidotel.com (1:275/311) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 275/311 106/1 261/38 123/500 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.