| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | SCO case |
Francois wrote to Lawrence at 18:53 11 Jun: LG>> Unfortunately, there's always the possibility that IBM /did/ LG>> convert some AIX code into the Linux kernel, and if so -- if that LG>> really did happen, I'd want to be as far away from a Linux LG>> installation as possible until I see exactly who the SCO Group is LG>> going to aim their poison darts at after IBM. FT> Don't forget that there is another possibility: that SCO, when it FT> was still called Caldera, put it in there itself. If you look at FT> the press release, the publicly avowed goal of Caldera when they FT> embraced Linux was to "blend the two technologies together". As FT> for IBM putting AIX code in Linux, I personnally doubt it. The two FT> systems have rather different underlying philosophies as far as FT> design goes. FT> Just read on slashdot that SCO is being sued for having violated FT> the terms of the GPL by including code from Linux in its FT> "personality" scheme without proper credit. Based on what I've been reading online for the past couple of weeks, this is no great surprise to me. One of the first objections I saw posted to the original suit against IBM was "what about the OpenServer/Unixware code that Caldera released in the SCO Linux package?". ---* Origin: lawrence{at}eforest.net | The Enchanted Forest (1:106/6018) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 106/6018 140/1 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.