"p-0''0-h the cat (ES)"  wrote in
news:rgmv6atpsk3scuhijrm4qg1cpeskor4b8j@4ax.com: 

> On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 00:29:51 +0000 (UTC), Dustin
>  wrote:
> 
>>"p-0''0-h the cat (ES)"  wrote
>>in news:kkjv6atjven1t13joodtt809e0l92626fa@4ax.com: 
>>
>>> On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 23:39:52 +0000 (UTC), Dustin
>>>  wrote:
>>> 
>>>>"p-0''0-h the cat (ES)"  wrote
>>>>in news:076v6a515t939fcvadqfd7h494b1u1pkpm@4ax.com: 
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 18:16:21 +0000 (UTC), Dustin
>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>~BD~  wrote in
>>>>>>news:gLWdnZsCc4lu5vLJnZ2dnUVZ7s-dnZ2d@bt.com: 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've only just noticed this comment!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Liar. I've mentioned it numerous times before.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> "*The virus has a bug* and it does not supply command line
>>>>>>> options to the host program correctly, so every program that
>>>>>>> operates with command line parameters will work incorrectly
>>>>>>> after infection." 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> So Dustin's not QUITE the wizard he thinks he is! ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Wrong again hotshot. No bug. One of several ####ups in the
>>>>>>description. Irok was written in ASIC. ASIC string limit is 80
>>>>>>characters. Any command line options which exceed 80
>>>>>>characters due to a limitation in the language used, will not
>>>>>>be passed entirely. No bug, though. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hey, ASIC kiddy, are you telling us that the great Dustin Cook
>>>>> couldn't work around that one? LOL. 
>>>>
>>>>*laugh* Sure I could. switch over to pure assembler/outright
>>>>machine code. Pull the exec environment (including command line
>>>>parameters) do alot of parsing, string manipulation outside of
>>>>my main program, pass control to host using pure assembler, so
>>>>that I can keeep all the work from the string parsing. 
>>>>
>>>>Risk something stomping on me, since i'm going outside of the
>>>>asic environment, nothing knows what I've been doing, I run a
>>>>very real risk of the next piece of asic code stomping all over
>>>>me (which is going to happen regardless, ASIC has no idea i'm
>>>>still running machine code over here.) 
>>>>
>>>>In other words, I chose stability and the limitation over risk
>>>>of unstable code and no command line limitation.
>>>>
>>>>Didn't really consider that question before posting it.. eh?
>>>>So... how much experience do you actually have writing low level
>>>>software? I'mma thinking, not going out on a limb here, that
>>>>it's ehh, not much.. yea? 
>>> 
>>> Too difficult for you eh? Nice bit of bull####. Didn't fool me
>>> though. 
>>
>>So that's your way of admitting you don't know WTF I was even
>>writing about eh? That'll work too, I suppose. 
> 
> I can spot a loser looking for excuses a mile away. 
> 
> Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly.

Pooh Cat.... Dustin's wriggling but can't get off the hook!

-- 
Jax        
--- NewsGate v1.0 gamma 2