Hello Maurice.

10 Sep 04 11:28, you wrote to me:

 RT>> Having fun, yes, also noticed that when using MsgEd on my JAM
 RT>> bases I tend to get "erros in the JAM header area, so will keep
 RT>> on using GoldEd on the BBSsystem, and use MsgEd on the point
 RT>> system. am pulling a totally fresh source tree, right now.

 MK> I did that yesterday and it wasn't any different.  Perhaps I jumped
 MK> the gun.  Isn't really an issue here at the moment although it did
 MK> cause me to wonder why the daily releases just for minor changes to
 MK> one particular file within any given package.  Isn't that what patch
 MK> is for?  Wouldn't a patch directory achieve the same end result that
 MK> downloading the entire archive without the unneeded bloat?  Now I
 MK> didn't do a diff but my guess is that it wouldn't have been all that
 MK> much different from the source I already had and a patch would have
 MK> been a more appropriate way of doing these types of things.  Perhaps I
 MK> am being too oldfashioned and frugal?

Well I just started compiling a new huskylib, smapi and fidoconf, when that 
is done, then hpt, htick, sqpack will be next, and then fastlst and msged.

Well *.diff files like we use for the nodelist might be a good way of doing 
things, but then a lot of folks, seem to take it for granted that internet 
access is allways available, and affordable every where, which is not allways 
the case.

Russell

--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.4.7