From: "Jerry" 
To: , 
Reply-To: "Jerry" 


        As one who had been following the Robo-Foucault
"experiment", I have
had now sense that James was involved in a "battle royal" over
accuracy of one method of test over another. I thought he was trying to
verify the method and accuracy of his robo system. I don't think the idea
was to prove a method such as Foucault right or wrong.


        I think I see where Carl is coming from. I have read on other forums
heated discussions of Foucault test accuracy. There seems to be quite a
number of people, ones who probably have little or no mirror making and
Foucault experience, who think that a Foucault test is not an accurate
method. I can't blame Carl for his statement. He wants to protect his
business from those who don't understand testing making statements that
affect what would be customers think of his methods.

        I don't know the quality of a ZOC mirror because I have never tested
one. But James had nothing but good things to say about the one he was
using for his experiment.

        I hope there are no hard feelings among those involved. I think Carl
was quite nice to have provided the mirror. And James intention was not to
say a method was wrong, but to verify his Robo-Foucault test.

        But James! You don't need to have a high quality mirror to verify
your robo results. You just need mirrors.

Jerry

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4