-=> Maurice Kinal wrote to Tony Langdon <=-


 TL> OK, I don't quite subscribe to the same logic, afterall, I had a
 TL> 64 bit capable processor (x86 style) before I had a 64 bit OS.

 MK> Which is the exact opposite to the situation here, where a 64 bit OS
 MK> was built on a 32 bit system before there was a 64 bit cpu.  Although I
 MK> didn't know it at the time it indeed did work as far as a kickstart to
 MK> the real thing.  I am hoping to replicate that except this time the
 MK> cross-compiler host machine is way ahead of the game which wasn't the
 MK> case the last time many, many years ago.

Cool. :-)

 TL> However, each to their own.

 MK> Something like that.

 TL> Well, if yo're already trying to cross compile 64 bit kernels,
 TL> perhaps you do need to but a 64 bit capable ARM system. :-)

 MK> We'll see but I think I now have something going which may tell the
 MK> tale as far as where I seemed to be headed with this idea.  As for the
 MK> 64 bit arm system the new year looks good.  I am in no rush.

Will be interested to see if your cross compilation is successful. :)


... Internal Error: The system has been taken over by sheep at line 19960
--- MultiMail/Win32 v0.49