-=> mark lewis wrote to Tony Langdon <=-

 ml> my troubling thought is that each defined DOSBOX is its own separate
 ml> entity... i'm not sure i like the fake share solution they came up
 ml> with... it doesn't seem to provide any actual file or record locking
 ml> that i can see from my quick perusal of the repo... i think that means
 ml> that two DOSBOX images using the same mapped directories for on-disk
 ml> comms and data sharing still won't work properly and won't be able to
 ml> both use the same data files at the same time :(

If that's the case, then that's a pity.  I only saw it out there, but not being
a C programmer, I had no idea what they had actually done.


... Buy Land Now.  It's Not Being Made Any More.
--- MultiMail/Win32 v0.49