From: David N. Barnett 

On Tue, 5 Nov 2002 15:53:12 -0000, "Adam Flinton"
 wrote in message :

| Distrib A does well on this but poorly on this so...all the other
distribs | nick the good bits & work on the poor bits etc.etc. &
then release so that | their distrib B does well on this but poorly on this
so.....all the other | distribs nick the good bits & work on the poor
bits etc.etc. & then release | so that their distrib C does well on
this but poorly on this so.....all the | other distribs nick the good bits
& work on the poor bits etc.etc. & then | release so that their
distrib D does well on this but poorly on this | so.....all the other
distribs nick the good bits & work on the poor bits | etc.etc. &
then release so that their distrib E does well on this but poorly | on this
so.....all the other distribs nick the good bits & work on the poor |
bits etc.etc. & then release so that their distrib F does well on this
but | poorly on this so.....all the other distribs nick the good bits &
work on | the poor bits etc.etc. & then release so that their distrib G
does well on | this but poorly on this so.....all the other distribs nick
the good bits & | work on the poor bits etc.etc. & then release so
that their distrib H does | well on this but poorly on this so.....all the
other distribs nick the good | bits & work on the poor bits etc.etc.
& then release so that their distrib I | does well on this but poorly
on this so.....all the other distribs nick the | good bits & work on
the poor bits etc.etc. & then release so that their | distrib A does
well on this but poorly on this so.....

This is what will continue to scare the average punter away from Linux and
toward the known-quantity monopoly OS.

--dnb

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4